Bondi gunmen 'meticulously' planned attack for months, police allege

10 months ago by MicroWave to c/world

Police release a tranche of documents allegedly tracing the suspects' movements prior to the deadly shooting.

The suspected gunmen in the Bondi Beach attack threw explosives at the start of the deadly incident and had practised shooting weeks before, according to new court documents.

They allege the pair "meticulously" planned the attack for months and, two days prior to the shooting, visited Bondi for reconnaissance.

Fifteen people were killed and dozens more injured when two gunmen opened fire on a Hanukkah celebration on 14 December. Explosives, including a "tennis ball bomb", failed to detonate, the documents said.

Naveed Akram, 24, has been charged with 59 offences, including 15 counts of murder and one of terror. A second gunman - his father, Sajid Akram - was shot dead by police at the scene.

GuyFawkes 37 points 10 months ago

In an unfortunate naming coincidence, every single time I see something about the Bondi gunmen I get briefly excited before realizing “Nope, not that Bondi.”

path: 0 21146487, hotness: undefined, score: 37, children: 4
Nanook 33 points 10 months ago

Phonetically both are beaches.

path: 0 21146487 21146715, hotness: undefined, score: 33, children: 0
ramble81 5 points 10 months ago

Sometimes I question if we’re living in a matrix controlled by AI and that this was caused by a hallucination because of the naming coincidence. Like they meant to enact another scenario instead but screwed it up.

path: 0 21146487 21148880, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 1
youngGoku 2 points 10 months ago

Haha maybe

path: 0 21146487 21148880 21152050, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
bklyn 4 points 10 months ago

You are definitely not alone. Fortunately, Pam Bondi will very likely lose her job soon.

path: 0 21146487 21147411, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
nogooduser 34 points 10 months ago

Let me guess what’s next. The government needs to be able to see all of our encrypted messages so that they can stop this from happening again.

path: 0 21147234, hotness: undefined, score: 34, children: 0
ilillilillilillililli 24 points 10 months ago

For months of planning, it sure seemed to go down so haphazardly.

  • Their shoddy explosives failed to detonate
  • Their position on the bridge offered little coverage for the assailants (once armed engagement finally began)
  • The father was oblivious to the good Samaritan approaching from behind and disarming him
path: 0 21148894, hotness: undefined, score: 24, children: 0
shalafi 4 points 10 months ago

They farted around, shot some shells, went to the place to check it out, bla, bla, bla.

And of course the media making this out like Seal Team 6 level of planning.

path: 0 21157409, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
world
world

@lemmy.world

login for more options
58478
34866
9153

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

  • Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:

    • Post news articles only
    • Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
    • Title must match the article headline
    • Not United States Internal News
    • Recent (Past 30 Days)
    • Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
  • Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.

  • Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed.

  • Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.

  • Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025

  • Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

  • Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

  • Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world

Ask Historians !askhistorians@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/...

  • Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link

go to feed...