Mandatory Developer Registration? Hardfork Android

6 months ago by VanillaWasp to c/privacy

Open Letter to Google Regarding Mandatory Developer Registration for Third-Party App Distribution

With the upcoming changes to how Google handle's app verification, the future of the android ecosystem looks pretty grim.

While there are calls to petition and protest, it is long past time to take our phones out of the hands of google and into the community.

With the mass tech layoffs, the ai storm taking jobs,etc, there are more than enough skilled devs with free time to make this happen. We as the community need to support them financially.

Please help spread the message in your various channels. If you're technically capable enough, start the process!

https://keepandroidopen.org/open-letter/

https://f-droid.org/...

PiraHxCx 45 points 6 months ago

Petitions and shit would only have any meaning if the decisions were based on ethicand public interest, but it's all money and power, so the only petition and open letters worth signing are those just saying fuck google and the human garbage running it

path: 0 22361502, hotness: undefined, score: 45, children: 4
XLE 20 points 6 months ago

Petitions are one tool in a much wider toolkit. As long as they're even somewhat effective, I don't see it reason not to utilize them.

path: 0 22361502 22361938, hotness: undefined, score: 20, children: 1
AntiBullyRanger -2 points 6 months ago

A code repository

path: 0 22361502 22361938 22362330, hotness: undefined, score: -2, children: 0
VanillaWasp 9 points 6 months ago

exactly that's why actions speak louder in these cases.

path: 0 22361502 22361532, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 1
AntiBullyRanger -3 points 6 months ago path: 0 22361502 22361532 22362359, hotness: undefined, score: -3, children: 0
floquant 16 points 6 months ago

I mean, that's great from a moral standpoint, but forking android will not also switch the billions of devices running it. The real problem is escaping or changing it at scale

path: 0 22362266, hotness: undefined, score: 16, children: 0
iturnedintoanewt 11 points 6 months ago

What process? It's all closed source drivers by Qualcomm et al.

path: 0 22361301, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 4
VanillaWasp 21 points 6 months ago

Lets not act like this is an impossible task.

There is a process and actually multiple ways to accomplish this. Looking into, we might not even need to fork android, but just support existing alternatives.

I would think the first step is to fork the Android Open Source Project. use that as a base, start cutting out any links to google, fill in the gaps, etc. This is obviously not my realm of expertise but there is a path.

"170,000 tech workers lost their jobs in the U.S. in the 18 months prior to mid-2025"

Don't tell me we can't scrape together a team of experts and make this happen. Yes there will be barriers and push-back, but its either this or we just keep deepthroating google.

https://arstechnica.com/...

https://itsfoss.com/linux-phones/

path: 0 22361301 22361524, hotness: undefined, score: 21, children: 3
XLE 9 points 6 months ago

Thank goodness for existing Android forks (which persist even now), and for projects like the Mecha Comet.

path: 0 22361301 22361524 22361956, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 0
Ajen 1 point 6 months ago

I don't think unemployed developers have as much free time as you seem to think they do. Do you know how much the mortgage payments would be for a house in silicon valley? Not to mention other bills like their kids' tuition, car loans, etc.

path: 0 22361301 22361524 22378516, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
AntiBullyRanger -8 points 6 months ago

gl!

path: 0 22361301 22361524 22361957, hotness: undefined, score: -8, children: 0
bitwolf 10 points 6 months ago

Wouldn't funding MicroG be the better call to action?

AFAIK this restriction will be part of Google Play certification and not AOSP itself.

That means we'd need the ability to unlock bootloaders to be maintained, and a good comparable open source abtraction to Google Play Services so users have a soft off-ramp from the Google Play ecosystem

path: 0 22362964, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 8
lambalicious 12 points 6 months ago

Technically the correct first thing to do is to make the manufacturers release the relock keys for relocking the bootloaders of extant hardware (say, the Moto G6 for an example). Having MicroG or whatever is not much useful if there's not going to be a feasible phone on which to install, so getting extant phones to become relockable with AOSP distros would be priority. And the way the economy si going and the RAM chips are not, forcing everyone interested to have to buy a whole new phone is not a smart choice.

Once the relock keys are out, fund All the Things. Lineage, Calyx, MicroG, what have you.

path: 0 22362964 22363786, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 4
lka1988 2 points 6 months ago

Technically the correct first thing to do is to make the manufacturers release the relock keys for relocking the bootloaders of extant hardware (say, the Moto G6 for an example).

Yeah, but that's not profitable, so they won't.

path: 0 22362964 22363786 22381678, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 3
lambalicious 2 points 6 months ago

Doesn't have to be profitable. Can also be punishable, either via adequate state violence, or via People violence. Could be interesting to see something like what the EU has made as a threat of removing all copyright safeguards for the US in case the US presents more as a threat, so I guess the equivalent would be removing all patent safeguards for tinkering with phone manufacturer firmwares if the manufacturers won't provide a solution for the People themselves.

path: 0 22362964 22363786 22381678 22395282, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
lka1988 2 points 6 months ago

Could be interesting to see something like what the EU has made as a threat of removing all copyright safeguards for the US in case the US presents more as a threat, so I guess the equivalent would be removing all patent safeguards for tinkering with phone manufacturer firmwares if the manufacturers won't provide a solution for the People themselves.

I can get behind that. Hoping this shithole country grows a spine soon.

path: 0 22362964 22363786 22381678 22395282 22420491, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
AntiBullyRanger 1 point 6 months ago

Don't let OP and sympathizers know this!!

path: 0 22362964 22363786 22381678 22389656, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
NotANumber 5 points 6 months ago

Believe it or not but the Pixel phones are some of the easiest to unlock and flash. You install graphene OS just through a web browser it's that easy. It is somewhat ironic given this move.

path: 0 22362964 22381473, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 1
AnnaFrankfurter 3 points 6 months ago

There was a reason for this. Google always branded pixel and nexus devices as a dev kit for Android OS. So all different brands of Android phones started their OS development with pixel. But last year Google announced they are no longer recommending pixel devices as the backbone of Android OS development and that companies and users should target cuttlefish their emulator for AOSP. With that they also stopped sharing device trees and vendor blobs. That is nothing new for custom ROM community but Google always provided that and that made custom ROM development really easy with very fast update cycles. I'm just hoping they don't lock down Bootloader like others

path: 0 22362964 22381473 22396959, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
x00z 3 points 6 months ago

Aren't they also trying to break AOSP? I thought GrapheneOS said something about how Google has been trying to work against them.

path: 0 22362964 22377397, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
VanillaWasp 3 points 6 months ago

The biggest way you can help is to TAKE ACTION. Get the ball rolling. Regardless what you think the solution is. Take action to make it happen. Don't wait on "someone else" will do it. If you don't have the skills or know how. Reach out to someone who does, keep the ball rolling

path: 0 22397719, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
AntiBullyRanger 1 point 6 months ago

I take [political] action by reaching out direct contributions to microkernel development. Folks that have no programming experience can also donate to folks already solving the problems Silicon Valley created.

That's how I politically roll.

path: 0 22397719 22426029, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Ilixtze 3 points 6 months ago

Does anyone know if Huawei phones will be affected as well?

path: 0 22362158, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 6
Luminous5481 5 points 6 months ago
path: 0 22362158 22366223, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 4
SpacePanda 1 point 6 months ago

😔 Thank you for the list but yeah basically all of them.

path: 0 22362158 22366223 22368344, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 3
AntiBullyRanger 2 points 6 months ago

"Huawei" isn't in that list🤦‍♀️

path: 0 22362158 22366223 22368344 22371688, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 2
SpacePanda 1 point 6 months ago

Huawei here I come!!

path: 0 22362158 22366223 22368344 22371688 22379659, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
AntiBullyRanger -4 points 6 months ago path: 0 22362158 22362477, hotness: undefined, score: -4, children: 0
solrize 1 point 6 months ago

You'd need phone vendors going along with it. Good luck with that.

path: 0 22362865, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
AntiBullyRanger -11 points 6 months ago

🚬🌬️

path: 0 22362079, hotness: undefined, score: -11, children: 9
null 2 points 6 months ago
path: 0 22362079 22362131, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 8
AntiBullyRanger -7 points 6 months ago

Have you ever programmed an operating system?
Especially for a handheld device?

path: 0 22362079 22362131 22362232, hotness: undefined, score: -7, children: 7
null 3 points 6 months ago

Have you ever danced with the devil in the pale moonlight?

path: 0 22362079 22362131 22362232 22362315, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 6
AntiBullyRanger -6 points 6 months ago

Thousands in Silicon Valley do.

Now watch this comment get downvoted.

path: 0 22362079 22362131 22362232 22362315 22362407, hotness: undefined, score: -6, children: 5
privacy
privacy

@lemmy.dbzer0.com

login for more options
6007
1184
1687

Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.

Rules

PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!

  1. Be civil and no prejudice
  2. Don't promote big-tech software
  3. No apathy and defeatism for privacy (i.e. "They already have my data, why bother?")
  4. No reposting of news that was already posted
  5. No crypto, blockchain, NFTs
  6. No Xitter links (if absolutely necessary, use xcancel)

Related communities:

Some of these are only vaguely related, but great communities.

go to feed...