Truth Social gets an extension in Digital World deal: reports

3 years ago by MicroWave to c/politics

Investors voted Tuesday to give the blank check company attempting to take Truth Social public another year to finalize its merger with former President Trump’s media startup, according to reports.…

Investors voted Tuesday to give the blank check company attempting to take Truth Social public another year to finalize its merger with former President Trump’s media startup, according to reports.

Shareholders in Digital World Acquisition Corp. (DWAC) granted the company a 12-month extension to close the deal with Trump Media & Technology Group (TMTG), just days before its Sept. 8 merger deadline, Axios reported.

This is the company’s second yearlong extension.

If the extension vote had failed, DWAC would have been required to liquidate and return the $300 million it raised to shareholders, according to Reuters.

Fredselfish 24 points 3 years ago

Anyone who invests in that media platform should be shamed and lose tons of money.

path: 0 3167470, hotness: undefined, score: 24, children: 4
SSUPII 10 points 3 years ago

A lot of people did lose money.

There is this screenshot too (with NSFW language, under this spoiler) from 4chan about a guy that did lose money

path: 0 3167470 3167972, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 2
FlyingSquid 15 points 3 years ago

No sympathy for that dumbass.

path: 0 3167470 3167972 3168060, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 0
Reptorian 5 points 3 years ago

The answer: Stop supporting the Republican Party. The only reasonable answer.

path: 0 3167470 3167972 3172162, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
Reptorian 4 points 3 years ago

I'd say they should double down and lose everything.

path: 0 3167470 3172192, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
Nightwingdragon 12 points 3 years ago
path: 0 3174947, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 2
cerevant 4 points 3 years ago

You are assuming that these investors want a return on their investment. This is just another dark money political op.

path: 0 3174947 3178039, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 1
Nightwingdragon 3 points 3 years ago
path: 0 3174947 3178039 3178528, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
NXTR 8 points 3 years ago

I used to work for a wealth management firm who got pre-IPO shares of DWAC. Even with the lockup period, anyone who bought those shares made an incredible amount of money. To anyone who invested at or after the IPO…they’ve lost quite a bit. Just goes to show that being good at investing boils down to having lots of money and knowing the right people. Basically the rich get richer with absolutely no risk while the average person gets fucked to line their pockets.

path: 0 3171971, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
autotldr 3 points 3 years ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Investors voted Tuesday to give the blank check company attempting to take Truth Social public another year to finalize its merger with former President Trump’s media startup, according to reports.

Shareholders in Digital World Acquisition Corp. (DWAC) granted the company a 12-month extension to close the deal with Trump Media & Technology Group (TMTG), just days before its Sept. 8 merger deadline, Axios reported.

If the extension vote had failed, DWAC would have been required to liquidate and return the $300 million it raised to shareholders, according to Reuters.

“Thank you for all of the outstanding support,” DWAC CEO Eric Swider said in a Truth Social post Tuesday.

The merger between DWAC and Truth Social’s parent company has been troubled.

The Justice Department announced charges against a former DWAC board member and two others in June for insider trading related to the merger, and the company agreed to pay an $18 million fine to settle fraud charges with the Securities and Exchange Commission in July.


The original article contains 203 words, the summary contains 165 words. Saved 19%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

path: 0 3166992, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
politics
politics

@lemmy.world

login for more options
31469
34159
9454

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

go to feed...