Filesystem for each purpose ?

5 months ago by tdTrX to c/datahoarder

1. Purpose

  1. Internal Disk - OpenZFS/ext4/NTFS ? for all OS (Win,Lin,mac)
  2. External Disk - Is exFAT OK ? Else OpenZFS/ext4 ? for all OS
  3. Backup Disk - guy says exFAT is bad for backup as it corrupts. so ***ext4/***OpenZFS ?
  4. SOHO Server/NAS - ZFS

2. OpenZFS vs BtrFS?

3.1 Is ZFS on Win/mac mature enough ?

3.2 If not Is Ext4 on Win/mac good ?

frongt 4 points 5 months ago

Don't try and put Windows and Linux on the same filesystem. It will just lead to pain. Use whatever you want for Linux, and ntfs for windows.

The external drive should be fat or ntfs. There's an ext driver for windows, and it works, but I trust the Linux drivers for Windows filesystems more.

Also, this post is hard to read. Extra formatting is not a substitute for readability.

path: 0 23818890, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
eldavi 3 points 5 months ago

ask yourself how oftend do you need the features that zfs or btrfs brings over ext3/4 or vfat?

that's how i decided to use ntfs for shared windows/linux volumes; zfs & btrfs was awesome, but i realized that i needed their features less often in my lifetime than i have fingers on my hand.

path: 0 23819282, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
hexagonwin 1 point 5 months ago

use ntfs for stuff you need to work on both win and linux. windows sucks and doesn't work well with anything else. avoid exfat/fat32.

path: 0 23832946, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 2
tdTrX 1 point 5 months ago

people say ntfs on linux is bad

Why to recommedn agsint exFAT ?

path: 0 23832946 23886168, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
hexagonwin 1 point 5 months ago

ntfs on linux isn't bad.

no journaling is the largest issue with exFAT, i've had data corruption with it numerous times during personal usage. i don't see any reason to use it over any other options

path: 0 23832946 23886168 23887438, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
datahoarder

@lemmy.ml

login for more options
10680
291
59

Who are we?

We are digital librarians. Among us are represented the various reasons to keep data -- legal requirements, competitive requirements, uncertainty of permanence of cloud services, distaste for transmitting your data externally (e.g. government or corporate espionage), cultural and familial archivists, internet collapse preppers, and people who do it themselves so they're sure it's done right. Everyone has their reasons for curating the data they have decided to keep (either forever or For A Damn Long Time). Along the way we have sought out like-minded individuals to exchange strategies, war stories, and cautionary tales of failures.

We are one. We are legion. And we're trying really hard not to forget.

-- 5-4-3-2-1-bang from this thread

go to feed...