Yes. Whenever I watch it, I’m astounded by how well the effects hold up. I can hardly believe that I’m looking at a film that’s over fifty years old.
Yes. Whenever I watch it, I’m astounded by how well the effects hold up. I can hardly believe that I’m looking at a film that’s over fifty years old.
GOOD. and do you now understand why people complain about modern cinema? I like intermissions, as relevant as they are... Laurence of Arabia would be my next epic movie suggestion. *edit: this is a SciFi comm. I understand. Hands up for film that last over 90min.
If there was ever a movie ahead of it's time it's this one...
Although some of the other older films that I would say were ahead of their time as well are:
They aren't sci-fi but are movies that really stick out to me (Manchurian Candidate is a tiny bit sci fi)
It's definately a classic. The sequel is good too.
Yes! 2010: the year we make contact (or something). It's pretty good, different director.
Maybe I'll get kicked out of the cool kids club for saying it, though I don't think I was every actually in it, but I disagree this movie not good.
Technically impressive sure, but it's plodding and the psychedelic space baby ending was completely nonsense.
The book is pretty cool too. It was written by Arthur C. Clark.
thanks for using Leebra!
go to feed...
It's honestly incredible that this movie was made in 1968 and had zero digital effects. Regardless of the plot it is a masterpiece of filmmaking.
save