Got banned from latestagecapitalism because GodlessCommie is a baby

11 days ago by elbucho to c/yepowertrippinbastards

In a post titled "Trump is symbolic of the rot of the US government", they were calling the concept of "harm reduction" (as in, voting for the person who's not literally Hitler) "bullshit that liberals tell themselves because they know that what they support is evil", because they're a sane, mature human who is not at all stupid as hell.

They didn't really like it when I pushed back on that narrative by pointing out that far more people have been harmed in the first 2 years of a Trump presidency than would have been over 8 years of a Harris presidency. Que sera, sera.

therealdries 21 points 11 days ago

would have been over 8 years of a Harris presidency.

Right, right... and Obama didn't unleash a campaign of drone terrorism on the world and Hillary Clinton wasn't schooled in the arts of imperialist slaughter by Henry Kissinger.

Donald Trump perfectly represents what the US is and always has been... and with him in the Waffle House, you Yanks don't get to ignore that and fall asleep like you do when one of your Dem Wall Street blow-up dolls fills your heads with smiley faces and lulls you back to sleep while they cause carnage throughout the world.

path: 0 24215188, hotness: undefined, score: 21, children: 0
punkisundead 19 points 11 days ago

You broke community rules (3&4) so mod action was taken. YDI

Also please attach a screenshot of the modlog with the removed comment, so I can verify that you actually commented what you claim to have commented.

path: 0 24211530, hotness: undefined, score: 19, children: 5
elbucho 2 points 11 days ago

I'm not actually sure how to screenshot that. When I go to that page, it just shows "removed by mod" on the posts that I made, and the screenshot that I posted above is the only thing I can see in the modlog (unless I'm just using the modlog incorrectly, which is 100% a possibility). Also, when I go to my profile, my past posts in that thread also show "removed by mod".

Is there some way that you know of that I can see the original messages?

path: 0 24211530 24211561, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 4
punkisundead -2 points 11 days ago

Yeah dont know if normal users can recover comments that got removed this way (ban + remove all comments from community).

But even taking everything you write as truth, I stay by my judgement.

path: 0 24211530 24211561 24211755, hotness: undefined, score: -2, children: 3
glimse 6 points 10 days ago

FYI that is correct. I wasn't able to see the comment that got me banned and I had to paraphrase the one time I posted here

path: 0 24211530 24211561 24211755 24227136, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
elbucho 2 points 11 days ago

Well, I'm happy to see that you don't actually care what was in the messages I wrote before judging me. Real cool.

path: 0 24211530 24211561 24211755 24211769, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
punkisundead 11 points 11 days ago

Is my wording so weird that people do not get my intention?

When I judge based on only what you write here, you have full control of the narrative and you can ommit things if you think it helps your case.

Screenshots would actually make it harder for you to do those things.

So me coming to a judgement just based on this is your best scenario, as I am taking your word for what happened. It would be only your own fault if you mispresented the situation.

So what exactly is your problem with that?

path: 0 24211530 24211561 24211755 24211769 24217004, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 0
mathemachristian 14 points 11 days ago

I don't understand people still defending Holocaust Harris. She lost, now they're probably going for Gruesome Newsom, this is the person the establishment wants you to defend now.

path: 0 24217692, hotness: undefined, score: 14, children: 2
Ensign_Crab 9 points 9 days ago

I don’t understand people still defending Holocaust Harris

Simple. She supported genocide even though it lost her the election. Nothing is more noble to centrists.

path: 0 24217692 24249581, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 1
eugenevdebs 2 points 8 days ago

They'll defend her when she runs every time, maybe the 3rd time she runs she'll win the vote.

path: 0 24217692 24249581 24261221, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
commie 10 points 11 days ago

voting

is not harm reduction

path: 0 24214876, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 0
mrdown 7 points 11 days ago

Why the american terrorist army and israel terrorist army did the biggest join military exercice aimed specifically on Iran during Biden. Why harris was fine with it?

YDI

path: 0 24210789, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 13
elbucho -5 points 11 days ago
path: 0 24210789 24211181, hotness: undefined, score: -5, children: 12
therealdries 17 points 11 days ago

Trump better for Iran

Yes. Trump is better for Iran. Trump's raging incompetence is the reason why Iran is winning the war.

path: 0 24210789 24211181 24215214, hotness: undefined, score: 17, children: 0
mathemachristian 12 points 11 days ago

Bomber Harris who vowed to make the US army the "most lethal in the world"?

path: 0 24210789 24211181 24217454, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 0
mrdown 6 points 11 days ago

The idiot is you who is feeling superior morally because he backed the lesser of the two terrorist side who still responsible of ten thousands of deaths.

path: 0 24210789 24211181 24211657, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 9
elbucho -1 points 11 days ago
path: 0 24210789 24211181 24211657 24211717, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 8
mrdown 5 points 11 days ago

Evil is evil. You are defending people responsible of ten thousands of deaths . I defend neither side. I do not give a damn about your shitty excuses , your shitty country and your shitty electoral system. 90 millions did not vote because politicians from both side ignored them for decades. It is the politicians obligation to serve people not people serving pollical parties . Harris, obama, Biden, Trump, Bush, Hilary Clinton should all be executed.

path: 0 24210789 24211181 24211657 24211717 24211786, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 7
Onomatopoeia 7 points 11 days ago

I mean you can't really make that claim. You have no idea what a Harris presidency would be like until it occurred.

You may say you believe that would be the case, and even put forth arguments supporting the prediction, but that's all it would be.

path: 0 24210739, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 5
curbstickle 6 points 11 days ago

I mean you can't really make that claim.

Lol

We know more than enough to make that claim day in and day out.

Suggesting otherwise is a rejection of reality.

path: 0 24210739 24212492, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
elbucho -2 points 11 days ago

You don't need a crystal ball here. In the entire multiverse of possibilities, precisely 0% of them would have resulted in the Harris presidency being worse for the world than a Trump presidency.

path: 0 24210739 24211191, hotness: undefined, score: -2, children: 3
Taleya 17 points 11 days ago

I mean she'd really have to work for the deaths caused by doge alone. Add in hormuz, food safety, EPA, weather monitoring......trump's gonna be something tthat fucks up the next multiple generations

path: 0 24210739 24211191 24212482, hotness: undefined, score: 17, children: 1
Flatworm7591 3 points 11 days ago

I agree with you to an extent, it's hard to see how she could have been worse than Trump, who is literally deranged.

On the other hand, Harris will 100% be lining up to support a bailout for "too big too fail" AI companies when the bubble bursts, like all the rest of the "centrist" Dems. She'd also have kept supplying Israel no matter what they did, same as Biden, same as Trump, same as all the other Zionists. Would she have started a war with Iran? Probably not. But she might well have started a war with Russia or China to prove how "tough" she is - and that possibility has surely got to be in the double digits? The war machine must be fed, after all. I do agree she'd have perhaps been a little better on climate change policy and on social policy, at least wrt identity politics issues.

In any case, the policy of this community is to not shame people for being anti-electoralist. If someone wants to vote, go ahead. I also vote - because imo I might as well, it's a low effort action. I just don't expect it to lead to any big changes. But we don't shame those who don't want to vote, for whatever reason. If a political party genuinely wants to expand their voter base they are gonna have to make some meaningful policy changes, instead of just pointing a loaded gun at the electorate (aka Donald Trump) and declaring themselves to be somewhat less terrible on certain issues.

path: 0 24210739 24211191 24212482 24224258, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
Ensign_Crab 5 points 9 days ago

Too bad her wing of the party was happy to accept another Trump presidency as long as they got to cheat their voters out of a primary. After all, if you give democrats the choice to vote against genocide, they might actually vote against genocide.

path: 0 24210739 24211191 24249615, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
MysticMushroom1776 4 points 9 days ago

YDM troll

path: 0 24247950, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
punkisundead 4 points 11 days ago

They didn’t really like it when I pushed back on that narrative by pointing out that far more people have been harmed in the first 2 years of a Trump presidency than would have been over 8 years of a Harris presidency. Que sera, sera.

This is just a bad way to have food faith discussions. There is no way to disprove something that is based on wishful thinking about how it could have gone. Of course one could write lengthy analysis of harm under Biden Harris, compare it with harm under Trump, extrapolate what could have happened under Harris, but in the end one would still have to believe the interpretation that one gets presented.

path: 0 24211927, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 14
elbucho -4 points 11 days ago

It's not "wishful thinking" to suggest that Harris would have behaved like pretty much every Democrat before her for the past 40 years. I will grant you that she could have had a stroke and Fetterman'd out, but I think you're seriously downplaying the sheer amount of destruction that Trump has caused. It would be extremely difficult for a James Bond-type supervillain to purposely do all the damage Trump has done on accident. Just use simple common sense, here, is all I'm asking.

path: 0 24211927 24211989, hotness: undefined, score: -4, children: 13
punkisundead 3 points 11 days ago

Since its common sense, it should be easy to prove your statement with some facts. Let me see those facts.

path: 0 24211927 24211989 24212046, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 12
Taleya 4 points 11 days ago path: 0 24211927 24211989 24212046 24212516, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 11
punkisundead 4 points 11 days ago

Thats a pretty one dimensional metric for suffering, I can do the same.

Trumps goverment deported 600000 till now

Biden and Harris deported 270000 in 2024

So if we want to compare 2 (actually 1,5) current years of Trump with 8 years of Harris, who was on track to continue Bidens path, we could see more than 2 million deportations in that time frame.

Edit: you demanded facts dude, don’t crack the shits when you get them.

Whats up with that part? Did me not responding fast enough make you add it? Dont really get what you want to communicate with that.

path: 0 24211927 24211989 24212046 24212516 24217109, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 10
LibertyLizard 4 points 8 days ago

Sounds like you literally did break the rules but wringthink rules are stupid, I don't care what everyone else thinks. PTB.

Also, people, you're not supposed to be arguing about the politics in question here. Stay on topic.

path: 0 24270074, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
null -8 points 10 days ago
path: 0 24238920, hotness: undefined, score: -8, children: 24
marxismtomorrow 7 points 10 days ago

"rational liberal" is an oxymoron. Rational people do not believe a permanent suffering underclass is necessary or good.

path: 0 24238920 24238992, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 1
null -9 points 10 days ago

See!

path: 0 24238920 24238992 24239019, hotness: undefined, score: -9, children: 0
MysticMushroom1776 6 points 9 days ago

Not surprising one of the more prolific trolls would agree with OP. Don't think I don't remember you.

path: 0 24238920 24247946, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 1
null -6 points 9 days ago

Who are you?

path: 0 24238920 24247946 24251645, hotness: undefined, score: -6, children: 0
elbucho -7 points 9 days ago

Thank you for saying that. The funny thing is - I'm also a leftist. But, because I used my vote to support the candidate with the best shot of preventing another Trump presidency instead of not voting and pretending that I was somehow making the world better doing nothing... I'm literally Hitler.

I did not actually know that this place was so fucking stupid and childish before I posted here, but hey - you live, you learn. I just hope that most of these people will chill out after they graduate high school.

path: 0 24238920 24245177, hotness: undefined, score: -7, children: 19
null -5 points 9 days ago

Lol unruffled being a PTB in this very thread should really tell you everything you need to know.

They will tolerate any behaviour from their in-group and ban/delete others for rules they invent on the fly and then refuse to explain them (I have receipts for this).

path: 0 24238920 24245177 24252294, hotness: undefined, score: -5, children: 18
eugenevdebs 3 points 8 days ago

How are they being a PTB?

Surely you have receipts for this then.

Edit; so that was a no, as usual.

path: 0 24238920 24245177 24252294 24261204, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 17
null -7 points 8 days ago

How are they being a PTB?

They only deleted my comment after I reported the clear uncivil namecalling by mystic mushroom. Unruffled had seen and downvoted it much earlier, and I didn't make any edits. Calling it "trolling" with no justification for it, and leaving the actual rule-breaking comment up.

Surely you have receipts for this then.

You can check the modlog for when they banned me for "report spam" (whatever that's supposed to mean), and actively blocked me when I asked them to explain what that means:

quGhKMYcyam40D9.png

path: 0 24238920 24245177 24252294 24261204 24261692, hotness: undefined, score: -7, children: 16
yepowertrippinbastards
yepowertrippinbastards

@lemmy.dbzer0.com

login for more options
1786
391
625

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.


Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
  2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
  3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
  4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
  5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules

  • Post only about bans or other sanctions that you have received from a mod or admin.
  • Don’t use private communications to prove your point. We can’t verify them and they can be faked easily.
  • Don’t deobfuscate mod names from the modlog with admin powers.
  • Don’t harass mods or brigade comms. Don’t word your posts in a way that would trigger such harassment and brigades.
  • Do not downvote posts if you think they deserved it. Use the comment votes (see below) for that.
  • You can post about power trippin’ in any social media, not just lemmy. Feel free to post about reddit or a forum etc.
  • If you are the accused PTB, while you are welcome to respond, please do so within the relevant post.
  • Keep the comments in YPTB posts about the moderation action itself, not about the general topic in which the moderation took place.

Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YPTB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.

  • PTB - Power-Tripping Bastard: The commenter agrees with you this was a PTB mod.
  • YDI - You Deserved It: The commenter thinks you deserved that mod action.
  • YDM new - You Deserved More: The commenter thinks you got off too lightly.
  • BPR - Bait-Provoked Reaction: That mod probably overreacted in charged situation, or due to being baited.
  • CLM - Clueless Mod: The mod probably just doesn't understand how their software works.

Relevant comms

go to feed...