Trump Calls Obama a “Son of a B*tch” After Disastrous Iran Deal Leaked

4 months ago by sanitation to c/politics

load all comments
consumptionone 21 points 4 months ago

April 30th 2011 is the turning point. Obama roasted Trump so hard at the White House Correspondent's dinner that night that Trump locked in on running for president out of nothing more than pure spite.

Donald Trump is here tonight! Now, I know that he's taken some flak lately, but no one is happier, no one is prouder to put this birth certificate matter to rest than the Donald. And that's because he can finally get back to focusing on the issues that matter—like, did we fake the moon landing? What really happened in Roswell? And where are Biggie and Tupac?

But all kidding aside, obviously, we all know about your credentials and breadth of experience. For example—no, seriously, just recently, in an episode of Celebrity Apprentice—at the steakhouse, the men's cooking team cooking did not impress the judges from Omaha Steaks. And there was a lot of blame to go around. But you, Mr. Trump, recognized that the real problem was a lack of leadership. And so ultimately, you didn't blame Lil Jon or Meatloaf. You fired Gary Busey. And these are the kind of decisions that would keep me up at night.

path: 0 24323833, hotness: undefined, score: 21, children: 11
CharlesDarwin 10 points 4 months ago

Well, Donvict was clearly worked up over Obama Presidenting While Black - it was obvious from all his stupid racist birther bullshit.

Sure, he wasn't the only one (anyone remember Orly Taitz, LOL?) but he quickly became the spearhead for the racists that were so GRRRR MAD that a black man was their President and tried to make their white hot racist rage all about long form birth certificates. It seriously broke the brains of the Republican Party/conservatives to have Obama as their President. I mean, they were already bad before, but after Obama, they only got worse. When conservatives blame Obama for their turn to someone as shitty as Donvict as their option, they are not exactly wrong, but they are not really understanding that they are telling on themselves.

Someone as disgusting and gross and racist like Donvict was almost bound to happen as a result of having a black President. Also, after the China White of someone like Palin, they were not going to settle for the methadone of Jeb! or Romney.

They wanted someone that would tell them to be their worst selves and be proud of it, because this country was "taken" from them and they need to "take it back". They viewed equality as oppression. They wanted someone that was the manifestation of Faux News, and Donvict is exactly that.

path: 0 24323833 24326222, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 9
ShotDonkey 4 points 4 months ago

Great analysis

path: 0 24323833 24326222 24340570, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
bagsy 3 points 4 months ago

This is a great analysis, but its very biased on recent events. There are groups working towards all of this since the civil rights movement. Trump happened to be the right person at the right time, but the plan had been in motion for decades before he came down that escalator. A lot of this started with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Weyrich and the https://en.wikipedia.org/....

path: 0 24323833 24326222 24343140, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 5
phutatorius 2 points 4 months ago

anyone remember Orly Taitz, LOL?

Yeah, whatever happened to Oily Taint? See seems to have gone silent around 2012 after her stellar career as a record-breaking vexatious litigant.

path: 0 24323833 24326222 24345937, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
lennybird 7 points 4 months ago

Idk why people say this. It wasn't the turning point. Trump had been hounding Obama on the false birther issue since he was elected practically, stoking the flames of the tea party. It was inevitable he was going to run.

path: 0 24323833 24334349, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
politics
politics

@lemmy.world

login for more options
31387
33985
9405

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

go to feed...