BBC puts up their favorite

2 days ago by geneva_convenience to c/unitedkingdom

CompactFlax 17 points 2 days ago

“We have to show all sides” and when one side is complete lunacy, I suppose any fair reporting would count towards the “other side”.

But in reality, some opinions need at the very least editorial context, or perhaps don’t need to be aired.

path: 0 25357428, hotness: undefined, score: 17, children: 4
geneva_convenience 21 points 2 days ago

They need to show all sides besides the left side

path: 0 25357428 25357578, hotness: undefined, score: 21, children: 0
Diplomjodler3 13 points 2 days ago

If one guy says two plus two is four and the other guy says two plus two is five, they will just report both sides and call that "balanced". Pointing out that one is objectively right and one is objectively wrong would have the wrong side screech about "bias" incessantly.

path: 0 25357428 25357605, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 2
floofloof 9 points 2 days ago

You're still too kind to them. Even if they did this they'd be giving equal attention to different parties and apply critical thinking equally to them. In reality studies have shown they spend disproportionate time on Reform at the expense of the Lib Dems and Greens, and tend to be less critical towards Reform's messaging than other parties, often simply reading out Reform's statements while being critical of the other parties.

path: 0 25357428 25357605 25357948, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 1
tburkhol 4 points 2 days ago

So, I have to admit, if there's a crazy guy on one street corner yelling "2 + 2 = 4," and another down the street yelling "2 + 2 = elephant," I will be more interested in elephant dude. More curious to figure our what's wrong with him, how he's managed to stay alive for so long, etc. More curious to know his opinion of 2 * 2 and 2 + 3. Definitely not going argue or push back much on the elephant claim, though.

I can imagine that political reporters, inundated with the same bland, boilerplate statements over the past two decades, would be fascinated by people spouting obvious sociopathic garbage. It does seem irresponsible to entertain that fascination, when you know that a certain part of the population can't recognize it as obvious sociopathic garbage.

path: 0 25357428 25357605 25357948 25358110, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
homesweethomeMrL 7 points 2 days ago

It worked for trump.

CNN would leave a camera on an empty mic side-by-side with the newsreader while a Clinton rally was in progress and never show the Clinton rally.

Only one of many ways they enabled and supported trump - as we should all be incredibly aware of, and yet, are not.

path: 0 25359877, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
ordnance_qf_17_pounder 6 points 2 days ago

Reform seems to get treated like they're the official opposition.

path: 0 25359944, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
unitedkingdom
unitedkingdom

@feddit.uk

login for more options
6868
6647
3091

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

go to feed...