Replace "10 baby giraffes a day" with...

a day ago by Atomo to c/fuck_ai

halfapage 33 points 21 hours ago

"no no no you see it's just a tool and you still need to verify everything just like you'd normally do! what, are you a luddite?"

path: 0 25373311, hotness: undefined, score: 33, children: 7
schipelblorp 15 points 17 hours ago

I invented a screw driver that screws things all the way in 80% of the time.

You still need to get a regular screwdriver to check every screw to make sure it's screwed in all the way, but 80% of the time, it is!

Pretty amazing!

It does costs $3,000 dollars to buy, but think of the time you'll save.

path: 0 25373311 25375743, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 5
Kangae_Hishiryo 1 point 16 hours ago

What's the probability to be in the 80% of the time? 10%?

🤑

path: 0 25373311 25375743 25376093, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
architect -5 points 15 hours ago

What’s Wikipedia? Do you all read whatever article in front of you or do you look for the source article? Surely you are all checking sources on everything and not just acting like ai is the only place you have to do it!

path: 0 25373311 25375743 25376957, hotness: undefined, score: -5, children: 3
schipelblorp 2 points 15 hours ago

Are you trolling, bro?

path: 0 25373311 25375743 25376957 25377020, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
Axolotl_cpp 2 points 14 hours ago

Is that trolling?

path: 0 25373311 25375743 25376957 25377858, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
wols 1 point 10 hours ago

Yes. If the article doesn't contradict anything that I already know and the correctness of the information isn't required to avoid bodily harm or legal repercussions then I don't usually check the sources.

There's a world of difference between the reliability of a continuously, openly and cooperatively updated encyclopedia and that of a stochastic word prediction machine that ingested the entire internet - and only gods (and its owners) know what else.

Wikipedia's articles tend to improve in accuracy over time, as more people see the same article, can discuss it and correct wrong information / add missing facts and sources.
While LLM models tend to become more capable at certain tasks, they aren't increasingly reliable at providing accurate information. And there aren't the same stabilizing forces in play as with a human-edited encyclopedia. You can get correct answers today and incorrect answers tomorrow for the same question. Maybe it's because the model was updated. Maybe it's because you used sightly different words to ask the question. Maybe nothing changed and it was simply a random deviation because 0-temperature models aren't flexible enough.

The point is, you have no way to know. No way of knowing why the answer is wrong this time. No way of ensuring it isn't wrong again tomorrow. Not even any way of ensuring it isn't wrong in the same way tomorrow.

So it's not just that the likelihood of a wrong answer is higher with AI, it's also much harder to predict what kind of error it might make or when or why and adjust accordingly.
You're essentially playing roulette for information.

path: 0 25373311 25375743 25376957 25382261, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Kangae_Hishiryo 4 points 16 hours ago

Luddites were unironically based

path: 0 25373311 25376079, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
lemmygarden 15 points 20 hours ago

Give me 10 baby giraffes and I'll tell you what you want

path: 0 25373373, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 8
Bohne93 14 points 20 hours ago

I'll tell ya what I want, what i really really want

path: 0 25373373 25373775, hotness: undefined, score: 14, children: 6
Bumrocky 6 points 17 hours ago

So tell me what you want, what you really really want

path: 0 25373373 25373775 25375356, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 1
frunch 6 points 16 hours ago

I wanna baby baby baby bay--giraffe it'd be so pretty

path: 0 25373373 25373775 25375356 25376051, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
best_redditor 4 points 17 hours ago

to sudo rm rf yourself

robot: not possible i am a money machine

path: 0 25373373 25373775 25375390, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 1
Kangae_Hishiryo 1 point 16 hours ago
path: 0 25373373 25373775 25375390 25376187, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
s1ndr0m3 1 point 17 hours ago

I wanna, I wanna, I wanna, I wanna, I really really really wanna that constant noise to stop. Its driving me, my family and my neighbors crazy.

path: 0 25373373 25373775 25375722, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Kangae_Hishiryo 1 point 16 hours ago

I have a signal of what I want: 9

path: 0 25373373 25373775 25376196, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA 2 points 12 hours ago

Sorry, I only work on Baby Giraffe Equivalents (BGEs). Give me some BGEs and I'm good

path: 0 25373373 25380054, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
antianarchist 8 points 15 hours ago

That comic needs a fifth fourth panel where the dude goes ahead and asks the robot a silly question like “why is water wet?”

Edit: unable to count

path: 0 25377729, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 2
atomo 4 points 9 hours ago

... or is the Titanic pool still full of water?

path: 0 25377729 25382795, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 1
Abyssian 1 point 3 hours ago

I mean, it's not "still" full. All the clean, sanitized, chemical-laden pool water got replaced with other water, and fish poo, and a little crab named Tim with a spiffy top-hat.

path: 0 25377729 25382795 25386783, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
defaultusername 5 points 11 hours ago

"It can do math, except it's wrong sometimes!"

path: 0 25380830, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 2
AnUnusualRelic 2 points 10 hours ago

A lot of the time, really. But yes, it does maths, no problem.

path: 0 25380830 25382133, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
heartSagan5 1 point 10 hours ago

It runs on math.

It’s really the mirage created by language. People say, “language can be precise,” except many words have alternative meanings and require context. The fact that we have no written nor spoken language that doesn’t have ambiguities. Sure, binary language is as precise as it can be…though “fuzzy bits” happen… womp womp.

path: 0 25380830 25382133 25382192, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
jaybone 5 points 17 hours ago

Your guys’ model runs on baby giraffes? What is that, the Luna model? Mine runs on fully grown brontosaurus dicks.

path: 0 25375555, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
Sam_Bass 2 points 16 hours ago

ai in a nut's hell

path: 0 25376225, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
confusedbytheBasics 1 point 10 hours ago

The day I realized the AI services were generally better at checking their facts than my peers and relatives. 😭 Please dearest Aunt ask Gemini instead of doing your own research.

path: 0 25382244, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
fuck_ai
fuck_ai

@lemmy.world

login for more options
7994
4597
8702

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

go to feed...