What bothered me is that, not a single person here has tried it - commented on it - given it regard. Because they assume “AI was used” means - Non-technical, AI-psychosis - sycophantic - worthless - low-in-value etc.

When my work gets disregarded when I know my stuff is top-notch - I can’t help but feel disrespected and incensed by the reasoning.

Think of it like - you’re a genius. You spend a few hours solving a problem. You drop it into the laps of the people who need that solution badly - and then get told that because you delivered that solution by drone instead of in person - they won’t even engage with it.

How does that make you feel? Especially when you did it all for free? Least I can get is real engagement. Could’ve just kept it to myself like I was planning to and said F everyone else.

The feedback is “not” difficult to accept. What’s difficult is ingratitude. Bruh, go tear apart my repo and call me a fool. But telling me you don’t want to even engage because you don’t like AI-generated text is nonsensical.

The difference between a genius and a crank is often very hard to discern. But usually, you can tell by the difference by which one concedes and scopes their claims and which one doesn’t.

Name calling? Nice. "Grown an ego" - No, I just don't like when people are wrong. Calling myself a genius is something new. I never did it before. Took me a long time to accept it was true. Calling myself that on a github comment section is totally extra. I can admit that. I probably have a chip on my shoulder. I can admit that too.

See? I can admit my faults. I haven't seen you or the other guy apologize or in anyway-shape-or-form acknowledge my arguments or give them any merit at all. So who really has the ego problem here?

Botty boi.