@fargeol @codeinabox Haha same, but I guess they're atleast trying to care about code quality.
But hey, let me know your thoughts.
My wrist pain has gotten worse and worse last winter and spring, so I decided to try letting Claude do much of the writing. On my established code bases it's surprisingly not shit. I do get more done, but I'm also much more tired now that I basically do code review 90% of the time I used to code in.
It's much worse and needs a lot of handholding for new code bases though.
Regarding the rust-glancer announcement itself, I hope the author is aware that lspmux (formerly ra-multiplex) exists, and zram. If lspmux didn't exist, then yes, editor restarts would have been annoying, but that has been a solved problem for a few years already.
Also, I'm not sure hitting SSD storage too much is good strategy in general, but maybe that's an overstated concern.
Otherwise, yes, RA could do better in memory consumption and some other aspects. And yes, the LSP protocol itself is not ideal.
In any case, introducing new ideas and approaches is always good, especially when there is no "fragmentation" concerns, which I think is the case here.
@programming.dev
Welcome to the Rust community! This is a place to discuss about the Rust programming language.
go to feed...
@programming.dev
Welcome to the Rust community! This is a place to discuss about the Rust programming language.
go to feed...
From https://github.com/rust-glancer/rust-glancer :
I don't know what to think about it.
save