"The character was then manually redrawn in Illustrator and Photoshop..."

a month ago by Wispy2891 to c/gaming

Modern "art"work redone by gpt-image-2 but they pretend that a human did that "manually" in Photoshop and illustrator

Origin: https://system3.com/...

gedfromgont 19 points a month ago

"Human-led" process, it was called in some other article.

path: 0 25579475, hotness: undefined, score: 19, children: 2
Wispy2891 2 points a month ago

Human led process then don't blatantly lie in the marketing copy where they pretend to redone everything manually in illustrator

path: 0 25579475 25579980, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
helix 1 point a month ago

Do you by any chance have a link to said article?

path: 0 25579475 25585253, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
helix 16 points a month ago

redone by gpt-image-2

Source? The article you linked says:

No generative AI was used in the creation of the artwork. Every stage began with the authentic original James Pond graphic and was completed using traditional digital illustration, 3D rendering and manual artistic refinement.

So if you have proof, please link the article which says it's genAI, not the marketing one.

path: 0 25579063, hotness: undefined, score: 16, children: 13
artyom 13 points a month ago

No proof but the style is reminiscent. On top of the fact that one of the horns is missing, the arc disappeared from its head, one of the udder rockets has been dislodged, and a pivot disappeared in the leg.

path: 0 25579063 25579899, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 4
helix 5 points a month ago

The horn is only missing in the 3D render, not the final photoshopped result. Actually this might be a case of "ugh let's just add this in post" instead of them having to model the horn. The arc disappeares because it's a 3D render and it's annoying to create lightning in 3D, much easier in 2D. The rocket looks like it's perspective and I don't see what you mean with the pivot.

path: 0 25579063 25579899 25580461, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 3
artyom 10 points a month ago

Year that's the point. The "3D render" is the genAI model.

path: 0 25579063 25579899 25580461 25580507, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 2
helix 0 points a month ago

I don't believe it, but you can prove me wrong by using the chatgpt-2 thingy and generating it again. Bet it looks totally different.

path: 0 25579063 25579899 25580461 25580507 25585243, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 1
Wispy2891 -5 points a month ago

That's the style of gpt-image-2. Without doubt. Source: all the thousands of pieces of slop with this style

path: 0 25579063 25579712, hotness: undefined, score: -5, children: 7
hungprocess 22 points a month ago

path: 0 25579063 25579712 25579822, hotness: undefined, score: 22, children: 1
NightFantom 8 points a month ago

Replace shopped with slopped and there's a clean meme

path: 0 25579063 25579712 25579822 25580340, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
helix 7 points a month ago

Bruh. Of course it looks like AI because AI is mimicking 3D artist's works.

I'm really against AI "art" as it's unimaginative, derivative, morally bankrupt and frankly offensive. But we should be wary of calling real art "AI" just because we don't like it, as this is a serious insult.

I once read of a non-AI artist being bullied on Twitter to the point they deleted their account and harmed themselves. This is something I will never want to be a part of. In dubio pro reo, especially since the studio in question seems to be quite proud they didn't make it with AI.

I'll be careful here and say it's not AI, even though I don't like the style either.

path: 0 25579063 25579712 25580443, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 4
Wispy2891 -6 points a month ago

It's the second image, not the 3d render. It's impossible that in 2026 a human artist will intentionally draw in that style letting everyone think that it's ai generated.

All cartoon characters generated by gpt are in that style

path: 0 25579063 25579712 25580443 25580846, hotness: undefined, score: -6, children: 3
obelisk_complex 6 points a month ago
path: 0 25579063 25579712 25580443 25580846 25582825, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 2
Ephera 5 points a month ago

Somehow, the 3D version looks more like the original than the 2D version, but it still has that fourth teat that's not attached to anything...

path: 0 25579097, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
manuallybreathing 3 points a month ago

Do you think if i started rewriting books from the 1990s, but updating the slang and such, would people give me money to buy food? Ha

path: 0 25583126, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
lIlIlIlIlIlIl 1 point a month ago

I think you’re confused

path: 0 25678858, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
gaming
gaming

@lemmy.ml

login for more options
28868
1637
776

Sub for any gaming related content!

Rules:

  • 1: No spam or advertising. This basically means no linking to your own content on blogs, YouTube, Twitch, etc.
  • 2: No bigotry or gatekeeping. This should be obvious, but neither of those things will be tolerated. This goes for linked content too; if the site has some heavy "anti-woke" energy, you probably shouldn't be posting it here.
  • 3: No untagged game spoilers. If the game was recently released or not released at all yet, use the Spoiler tag (the little ⚠️ button) in the body text, and avoid typing spoilers in the title. It should also be avoided to openly talk about major story spoilers, even in old games.

go to feed...