Germans pitch EU plan to circumvent national vetoes | Euractiv

a month ago by CAVOK to c/europe

load all comments
mysteryhumpf 46 points a month ago

Good I really hope this happens. Vetos will destroy the EU. It’s not democracy if one autocrat can stop everything.

path: 0 25590168, hotness: undefined, score: 46, children: 26
brastak 8 points a month ago

I believe veto was the thing that has destroyed the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth

path: 0 25590168 25593627, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
Zombie 7 points a month ago

It's not democracy if the majority can compel the minority to go against their will. Germany and France will become the dominant powers even more so than they already are which will ultimately result in the slow erosion and downfall of the EU being what it claims to stand for. Vetoes and consensus democracy were founding ideas for a reason.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consensus_democracy

It's convenient to hold up Hungary as the evil example of misused vetoes but the solution to that is to move to suspend countries as a member, for acting in bad faith repeatedly. Using freedom from association. Not to destroy your democracy from within by making it less democratic.

https://en.wikipedia.org/...

path: 0 25590168 25591050, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 21
khannie 26 points a month ago

It's not democracy if the majority can compel the minority to go against their will.

That's.... Exactly what democracy is though. Like Brexit is a great example of this. The majority forced the minority against their will.

I take the rest of your point though and agree. We just need to get past the "one or two arseholes" issue. I'd be happy with some kind of supermajority decision making process.

path: 0 25590168 25591050 25593393, hotness: undefined, score: 26, children: 17
mysteryhumpf 7 points a month ago

Qualified majority makes sure that even without veto France and Germany don’t become dominant.

path: 0 25590168 25591050 25596905, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 1
motogo 4 points a month ago

You're absolutely right and I do agree. At the same time what this is about is not about many smaller countries getting dominated by big countries. This is about prohibiting foreign powers to bribe their way into power in EU via puppets in a single EU country. As a citizen in a small country I have no concerns that our neighbours in also smaller countries will not agree on certain political decisions where Germany and France may have a different persuasion. If so I naturally would expect a diplomatic consensus would be found.

path: 0 25590168 25591050 25591657, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
ExLisper 7 points a month ago

Veto was put in place so that smaller countries wouldn't have to worry that after joining EU bigger countries will outvote and exploit them. I think requiring unanimity is fine in some cases but EU should have mechanisms to move on without some members if they object. Trade deals? Unanimity required. Sanctions on foreign countries? Majority decides. Military aid? Majority decides.

path: 0 25590168 25597743, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 2
UnfortunateShort 3 points a month ago

I feel like you could also provide protection for smaller countries through law and the ECJ, or legislative procedures/instruments other than vetos. For example laws to prevent decisions that are overwhelmingly negative for few countries, processes that direct compensation to countries negatively affected by laws, or a veto leading to a compulsory mediation process rather than a full stop.

path: 0 25590168 25597743 25613140, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
europe
europe

@feddit.org

login for more options
12172
12142
4780

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

  • on any topic: Al Mayadeen, brusselssignal:eu, citjourno:com, europesays:com, Breitbart, Daily Caller, Fox, GB News, geo-trends:eu, news-pravda:com, OAN, RT, sociable:co, any AI slop sites (when in doubt please look for a credible imprint/about page), change:org (for privacy reasons), archive:is,ph,today (their JS DDoS websites)
  • on Middle-East topics: Al Jazeera
  • on Hungary: Euronews

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the admin that applied the rule (check modlog first to find who was it.)

go to feed...