Paramount Settles Antitrust Case With State A.G.s, Removing Obstacle to Warner Bros. Deal

25 days ago by ValueSubtracted to c/quarks

Paramount has reached a deal with California Attorney General Rob Bonta and 11 other state A.G.s that clears a major obstacle acquiring Warner Bros.
StillPaisleyCat 2 points 25 days ago

This sounds like more of a wishful thinking deal-in-principle.

Ellison is promising to make a vast number of cinematic releases (30 per year) but the states are looking for concrete structural requirements, such as to sell off holdings where there would be excessive concentration.

Here is The Hollywood Reporter’s take.

Ellison, for his part, promised to release a minimum of 30 films per year theatrically, though many in the industry remain skeptical about how long the company can sustain that level of production.

Bonta had maintained he’ll only accept structural remedies, which typically involve companies selling off parts of the combined business. It’s believed a sticking point for the states in any settlement involved Paramount operating the two studios as independent businesses and selling off parts of its cable business. For Ellison, parting ways with CNN was a no-go. 

Still, the specifics of a deal are still TBA, including any potential divestitures.

path: 0 25941898, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 4
ValueSubtracted 2 points 25 days ago

Yeah, I fully expect the final "deal" to be rather toothless.

path: 0 25941898 25942025, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 3
StillPaisleyCat 1 point 24 days ago

It may be that one won’t be reached at all.

The states may be dragging this out until after the November midterms to see if they may have more leverage in DC later.

path: 0 25941898 25942025 25945639, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 2
ValueSubtracted 2 points 24 days ago

Looks like the news just broke - the terms can be found here.

path: 0 25941898 25942025 25945639 25945751, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
StillPaisleyCat 2 points 24 days ago

Ooh, the states have gone for a number of conditions that will crystallize into requirements for divestments if Paramount fails to meet its expansive promises.

…Which the states likely believe will happen.

It’s a smart way for both sides to kick the problem downstream a bit until there’s a new administration.

It’s also a way for David Ellison to lock himself legally into doing things he personally wants to do (massive amounts of scripted production) while holding off his father and other investors.

path: 0 25941898 25942025 25945639 25945751 25946448, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
quarks
quarks

@startrek.website

login for more options
2216
442
190

Come to Quark’s, Quark’s is Fun!

General off-topic chat for the crew of startrek.website. Trek-adjacent discussions, other sci-fi television, navigating the Fediverse, server meta (within reason), selling expired cases of Yamok sauce, it’s all fair game.


go to feed...