Or he could, now hear me out for a second, aim taxes higher than 2.5%.
Or he could, now hear me out for a second, aim taxes higher than 2.5%.
He already had his chance to fix it, but he crumbled to the whiners about low taxes.
The province ought to kick in money if they are limiting development charges but yes, higher property taxes and service rates (water/garbage) are the only sustainable way forward. You can't find "efficiencies" forever.
My comment was pretty vague but yes, I was referring to the funding for this coming from external sources including the provinces program for lowering DC.
You may be choosing to simplify the description of the program for brevity, but this isn't an agreement to reduce DC by 50%: https://www.ontario.ca/...
It's a funding program that needs to be applied to, and the pool of money is handed out based on the criteria on that page.
None of this prevents the province from ordering a municipality to lower their DCs based on their whims. That's a fear in the municipal asset management world throughout the country: capacity upgrades have been delayed and delayed to keep spending down, and with the push for housing the provinces are targeting DCs and are like, "too bad lol".
Eta: I would encourage people to read this: https://www.calgary.ca/...
I don't understand what this means?
I’m pretty annoyed that this election is going to “more garbage bins, no improvements”
This city needs some ambition. Look at Mamdani, why the hell can’t we have that!?
They have a different system, the mayor has a lot more power.
We really should start making our politicians sign legally binding contracts, instead of letting them "pledge" to do things they have no intention of doing.
Come up with a real plan, that actually works by the numbers, and sign a contract to get it done.
I don't see how that would be enforceable at any level, as I can't think of a plan that is without the need for external cooperation.
Municipal politics is especially challenging for an idea like this. Municipalities operate under rules the province sets. That's how they were able to remap wards and change the number of councillors in Toronto, for example. Strong Mayor powers are extremely limited, given to a few cities, and are designed to make it easier for cities to push forward the goals of the province despite local opposition.
Further, but more of a personal opinion, I don't think candidates (especially municipal, especially if not incumbent) know enough to make effective plans. It's one thing to view from the outside, but without access to the staff who have all the history and supporting documentation, it's just not realistic.
See, in order to actually do it, you rework the entire system top to bottom.
If politicians are in legally binding contracts, they won't be lying to all of us constantly.
The entire idea requires a completely different system than we have, with the existing system, they just lie with impunity, or were "wrong" about a subject they pushed, and see no negative effects of that at all. You or I do that at our jobs, and we're fired.
If you're suggesting that you simply cannot hold public officials to their word, because reasons that just isn't good enough. That's just acknowledging that we're letting them lie to the citizenry with no consequences at all.
If they're found to be corrupt, arrest and jail them. What we do now is abhorrent when it comes to the political class lying with impunity.
Respectfully, I think you are giving municipal politicians too much credit.
Do they promise things they have zero power to achieve? Yes, absolutely. I would like to see better understanding of how municipalities operate so that people can see through that. And to understand wording like "work towards" and "advance" and being super vague because he can't promise to actually do much.
If you're suggesting that you simply cannot hold public officials to their word, because reasons that just isn't good enough. That's just acknowledging that we're letting them lie to the citizenry with no consequences at all.
I'm saying he's not actually promising much if anything, because he can't do much, if anything. I can be more specific, if you'd like. Here is his plan: https://marksutcliffe.ca/priorities/infrastructure I will focus on what he can do, not whether it's a good idea.
I will expand the application of a climate lens for infrastructure investments
Through analysis and community consultation, I will identify Ottawa’s worst intersections and will fix the 50 worst.
Roads in many local communities and former municipalities, such as Nepean, are more than 20 years old. I will develop a dedicated funding stream for improving aging local roads throughout rural, urban, and suburban Ottawa.
I will work with the federal and provincial governments to secure major investments, such as the $4 billion upload of the LRT and the start of LRT Phase 3 to Kanata, Stittsville, and Barrhaven.
Ottawa should have a downtown core that reflects the greatness of Canada. By addressing intersections and nodes that hinder this key area, we can bring a true national capital experience closer to visitors, residents and commuters. I will advance the redevelopment of Rideau Street and Sussex Drive by rationalizing traffic flow, promoting pedestrian accessibility and prioritizing public safety.
I will modernize and undertake a full reform of infrastructure procurement and planning to deliver infrastructure more quickly and thoughtfully. We will examine how much infrastructure costs in Ottawa compared to other municipalities to ensure that we are getting the best value for money possible on our investments.
(My popcorn is READY for this one.)
To advance this new strategy, I will create a new Parks and Recreation Committee of Council, ensuring that capital, operating, and planning decisions regarding City parks and recreational centres are properly considered, coordinated, and consulted on with members of the community.
We will also explore new revenue sources to help offset debt costs, including naming rights, advertising strategies on both municipal sites and through by-law changes that permit digital signage in more locations city-wide subject to municipal fees, and mixed-use redevelopment on sites that can support it while retaining or enhancing existing community uses.
Before communities are built, I will ensure infrastructure like roundabouts, traffic lights, and sidewalks are constructed prior to residents moving in. I will ensure that the infrastructure is built prior to homes being built by leveraging front ending agreements.
I will work with the provincial government to move forward quickly on the Ring Road, creating the conditions to remove trucks from Manotick and surrounding communities, as well as lower congestion on the 417 and truck traffic in the downtown core.
I will ensure we receive our fair share of infrastructure investment from other levels of government, as I have successfully done in my first term.
Before communities are built, I will ensure infrastructure like roundabouts, traffic lights, and sidewalks are constructed prior to residents moving in. I will ensure that the infrastructure is built prior to homes being built by leveraging front ending agreements.
Through analysis and community consultation, I will identify Ottawa’s worst intersections and will fix the 50 worst.
Through the $10-billion infrastructure plan, I will rapidly expedite the speed at which this renewal work is undertaken so that a full municipal renewal is completed by 2033.
I will invest $500 million by 2030 to develop 1,000 kilometres of new or resurfaced traffic lanes, inclusive of new roads, widenings, and restoration work to ensure commutes are safe, fast, and frustration-free. This includes a $50-million increase in rural road funding, compared to the 2022-2026 term of Council.
I will ensure that funding is provided or construction is started on at least four new community or recreation complexes, with at least one located in every region of the city, including the Barrhaven Civic Centre, a new facility at Confederation Heights, and a new facility in Vanier.
I will find another $250 million in savings and efficiencies over the next four years, as I did over the last four years. These measures allow us to invest without asking local families to pay more.
I will prioritize infrastructure investments in communities where flood risks are present, moving quickly to upgrade infrastructure to improve resilience against future extreme weather events.
I will advance priority transportation infrastructure projects that ease traffic. This will include new roads, widening existing arteries, and adding new traffic signals and roundabouts.
I will also prioritize $1.3 billion of expedited new bus rapid transit or dedicated bus lane projects.
I will ensure that funding is shifted toward “missing links” in our network for sidewalks and multi-use pathways that are used as routes for kids to get to school, such as the sidewalk on Church Street in North Gower.
Ottawa should have a downtown core that reflects the greatness of Canada. By addressing intersections and nodes that hinder this key area, we can bring a true national capital experience closer to visitors, residents and commuters. I will advance the redevelopment of Rideau Street and Sussex Drive by rationalizing traffic flow, promoting pedestrian accessibility and prioritizing public safety.
Over the next four years, $500 million is prioritized for investments in infrastructure that make our communities stronger in the face of extreme weather, such as the heavy rain events that caused flooding. This will include upgraded storm sewers, ditch enhancements, and more. Priority will be given to addressing infrastructure gaps in flood-prone communities as guided by expert recommendations.
Over the next 10 years, there is over $400 million worth of renewal work across all our city recreational facilities, representing roughly 6,000 projects.
To fund this effort, a mix of parkland dedication and unlocked cash in-lieu of parkland will be advanced. New parks will include a mix of new dog parks, new central / district parks, parkettes and urban “third spaces”, fully revitalized parks in existing communities, new parks in communities with fewer existing amenities
I hope this helps. I think the public needs to stop thinking of municipal politicians as people who can promise results and instead look to what they say they will prioritize and support.
@lemmy.ca
News, events, discussions, and what not from Ottawa, Ontario.
Municipal website: https://ottawa.ca/
XMPP: empty
Telegram: https://t.me/chatottawa
Discord: https://discord.gg/TrCHrucmqJ
Please note the following:
* All chatrooms are linked together. If you join one room your messages will be copied to the other platforms.
* Matrix is an open source and potentially distributed chat protocol. The matrix room listed is hosted on matrix.org, a somewhat centralized hub for a lot of currently public rooms. Though the protocol itself is free, libre and open source, the deployment of the protocol resembles a centralized service. This may be fixed in the future with the deployment of independent servers.
* Be aware that both Telegram and Discord are centralized proprietary platforms and do not necessarily protect your rights nor privacy while simultaneously giving power to corporations.
go to feed...
@lemmy.ca
News, events, discussions, and what not from Ottawa, Ontario.
Municipal website: https://ottawa.ca/
XMPP: empty
Telegram: https://t.me/chatottawa
Discord: https://discord.gg/TrCHrucmqJ
Please note the following:
* All chatrooms are linked together. If you join one room your messages will be copied to the other platforms.
* Matrix is an open source and potentially distributed chat protocol. The matrix room listed is hosted on matrix.org, a somewhat centralized hub for a lot of currently public rooms. Though the protocol itself is free, libre and open source, the deployment of the protocol resembles a centralized service. This may be fixed in the future with the deployment of independent servers.
* Be aware that both Telegram and Discord are centralized proprietary platforms and do not necessarily protect your rights nor privacy while simultaneously giving power to corporations.
go to feed...
no tax. only spend.
How does that work again?
save