E-Readers Are More Effective than Paper for Some with Dyslexia

10 days ago by cm0002 to c/books

E-readers are fast rivaling print as a dominant method for reading. Because they offer accessibility options that are impossible in print, they are potentially beneficial for those with impairments, such as dyslexia. Yet, little is known about how the use of these devices influences reading in those who struggle. Here, we observe reading comprehension and speed in 103 high school students with dyslexia. Reading on paper was compared with reading on a small handheld e-reader device, formatted to display few words per line. We found that use of the device significantly improved speed and comprehension, when compared with traditional presentations on paper for specific subsets of these individuals: Those who struggled most with phoneme decoding or efficient sight word reading read more rapidly using the device, and those with limited VA Spans gained in comprehension. Prior eye tracking studies demonstrated that short lines facilitate reading in dyslexia, suggesting that it is the use of short lines (and not the device per se) that leads to the observed benefits. We propose that these findings may be understood as a consequence of visual attention deficits, in some with dyslexia, that make it difficult to allocate attention to uncrowded text near fixation, as the gaze advances during reading. Short lines ameliorate this by guiding attention to the uncrowded span.
books
books

@sh.itjust.works

login for more options
362
86
89

A subreddit to thoughtfully discuss books of all kinds – novels, poetry, fiction, non-fiction – as well as all things relating to them, from the publishing industry to literary criticism.

Rules:

  • Debate must be conducted in a respectful and dignified manner and without resorting to the impugning of other members' character.
  • Abuse, intimidation, harassment, and deliberately antagonistic behaviour is absolutely prohibited.
  • No racism, sexism, homophobia, or any other form of bigotry or hate.
  • If you link to an article behind a paywall, you must copy and paste the article in full in the body of your post.
  • While not required, you are strongly encouraged to provide direct citations or references for claims where this would be clearly helpful for fellow users to verify.

go to feed...