WereHacker 5 points 4 days ago

The term tankies always confuses me. It seems to mean something different for anyone who uses it. Could you please give an example

path: 0 26261228, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 10

agamemnonymous 4 points 4 days ago

The term "Tankie" originated in the UK during the Cold War to refer to British leftists who approved of the Russians using tanks to violently end the Hungarian Revolution of 1956. Broadly, it refers to any "leftist" who endorses authoritarian methods, so AuthLeft basically. If your vision of the revolution requires gulags and firing squads, you're a tankie.

save

path: 0 26261228 26266696, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 8

WereHacker 1 point 3 days ago

Thank you. That is a good definition. I personally am very careful not to judge others stances on stuff. That goes double for other leftists. I find slurs tend to dehumanize others instead of understanding them. But I do understand the frustration over people who seem to get it and then suddenly defends attack on civilians and the like.

This position has resulted in people calling me a tankie here on lemmy.

Would it be too much to ask of you come with an example instead of just a definition?

save

path: 0 26261228 26266696 26277175, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 7

agamemnonymous 1 point 3 days ago

I mean, the definition is based on an example: supporters of the USSR's use of tanks to crush the Hungarian Revolution of 1956.

But other examples include denying or excusing authoritarian behavior carried out by nominally "socialist" regimes: imprisoning or executing dissidents, imperialism, suppression of freedom of expression, etc. Usually there's an undertone of double-standard where regimes that call themselves "Communist" or "Socialist" are excused for actions which would be considered authoritarian oppression under a liberal government.

save

path: 0 26261228 26266696 26277175 26280240, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 6

Calfpupa 1 point 3 days ago

It's not a double standard, that's just ignoring who is being oppressed.

save

path: 0 26261228 26266696 26277175 26280240 26280409, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 5

mysticpickle 3 points 4 days ago

save

path: 0 26261228 26265048, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0

OwOarchist 1 point 4 days ago

Tankies be more like, "I'll put up with a little communism as long as I get all the authoritarianism I want."

save

path: 0 26259792, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0

Amnesigenic 1 point 3 days ago

The "authoritarians" just coincidentally happen to be the only communists who don't get fucking couped by the CIA, but I'm sure your specific version of horizontal heirarchy-free resistance will have better results

save

path: 0 26285300, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0

TheStaffmaster -1 points 3 days ago

true, but the chance that it will become authoritarian is very high, which is why a lot of people dislike it.

boiled down, Communism and Oligarchy operate in starkly similar ways.

Oligarchy: Corporations run the Government

Communism: Government runs the Corporations

It doesn't matter if under one it's done for profit and under the other it is done to supply need, the people at the top will try to bend the system for their own benefit eventually.

save

path: 0 26284432, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 0

I'll know it when I see it

I'll know it when I see it