Federal Court Says Flock ALPR Database Searches Require A Warrant

2 days ago by Sunshine to c/privacy

On one hand, it’s great to see a ruling like this. On the other hand, it’s not going to set any precedent, not even in its own jurisdiction. But it does push this conversation forward, …
bitteroldcoot 19 points 2 days ago

Right.... I'm sure everyone will do that before using it.

path: 0 26269001, hotness: undefined, score: 19, children: 0
ulterno 2 points a day ago

That sounds nice. Now implement it like this...

User enters username and password then enters the Prompt.
The Prompt gets generated into a request form.
In the form, then the user fills the reasoning behind the prompt and attaches the required documentation and sends the request document to the Court.
This document gets archived for eternity and also reaches the Court along with the full history of the user.
The Court assigns the request to those that process warrants. After processing, if the request is accepted, then it goes to a judge that checks it and gives its digital signature, to create an acceptance token.
This token then goes back to the user's system which then causes the Prompt to be passed to the AI interface.

The same for all follow-up prompts.

path: 0 26279633, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
privacy
privacy

@programming.dev

login for more options
5286
2140
2399

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

go to feed...