NIH Employees Lived in a Culture of Fear, So They Started Keeping Receipts

13 hours ago by Tony Bark to c/politics

Sylvia Chou had been with the National Institutes of Health for 18 years when she decided to resign in January 2026, 1 year after the second Trump Administration took office. At the time of her resignation, she was serving as a program director at the NIH’s National Cancer Institute, and her specialty was health communication. One of her areas of expertise, health misinformation, became a topic that was more relevant than ever at the end of her career at NIH.

Over the course of 2025, top–down directives brought significant changes to NIH’s grant funding policies and infrastructures, curtailing the independence and integrity that had long defined the institution. These directives dictated what kind of science was deemed acceptable, how funding decisions were made, and how health information could be communicated to the public. They also brought significant disruptions to NIH’s workforce. Since January 2025, NIH has lost over a fifth of its workforce because of layoffs, resignations, and early retirements, causing generational expertise to disappear.

Along with a group of her colleagues at NIH, Chou helped to organize the Bethesda Declaration, a letter signed by nearly 500 NIH employees in June 2025 that advocated for the protection of scientific integrity, academic freedom, and restoration of politically disrupted research funding. One year later, the same group issued a follow-up to this declaration, writing that “the chaos of 2025 has been replaced with coordinated, systematic, institutionalized destruction in 2026.”

Chou was one of roughly 90 people who signed the Bethesda Declaration by name and has chosen to speak publicly about her experience as a federal worker navigating this turmoil. From this vantage point, the Observer’s Managing Editor Hannah O. Brown talked with Chou about her experience on the frontlines of a historic disruption of scientific research.

politics
politics

@lemmy.world

login for more options
31375
33943
9297

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

go to feed...