AI Overview

an hour ago by inari to c/microblogmemes

Daxter101 10 points an hour ago

Sorry, can someone explain? Looks interesting but I'm not getting it.

path: 0 26293399, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 3
duckCityComplex 16 points an hour ago

Both queries look like they were accidentally submitted before the user was done typing. Since the one on the left begins with the grammatically incorrect "Is we getting," Google's AI response seems to assume the person is asking about one of Donald Trump's claims that he will be sending checks to US citizens for various reasons.

The one on the right is grammatically correct and the AI makes no assumptions and simply points out that the query is incomplete.

If this is real, it reinforces the stereotype that Trump supporters (or other individuals likely to believe his claims) are poorly educated.

path: 0 26293399 26293516, hotness: undefined, score: 16, children: 0
ShellMonkey 9 points an hour ago

My guess is it's playing off the stereotype of certain groups ways of speaking. "is we" vs "are we"" and tying it to asking for government payments.

path: 0 26293399 26293528, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 0
OpenHammer6677 8 points an hour ago

"Is we getting" implies lower quality education, it looks like, and the screenshot shows Google Ai result assuming the one searching is so and is asking about getting stimulus checks even without actual context

"Are we getting" - Google Ai result shows an expected answer (that the statement is simply incomplete)

path: 0 26293399 26293545, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
aeronmelon 5 points an hour ago

Google puts the system in systemic.

path: 0 26293326, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
Ioughttamow 1 point 3 minutes ago

Is we getting my baby?

path: 0 26294160, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
microblogmemes

@lemmy.world

login for more options
12305
5172
10259

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, Twitter X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

go to feed...