She's obviously free to no longer dress provocatively, but demanding that photos she has publicly released no longer be viewed, or viewed only under certain conditions, is ridiculous.
She's obviously free to no longer dress provocatively, but demanding that photos she has publicly released no longer be viewed, or viewed only under certain conditions, is ridiculous.
People saying that to her, whether she was asking them to stop or not, is completely inappropriate. But we live in a world of 8 billion people, the vast majority of which have internet access. Unfortunately there will always be a few weirdos saying creepy shit.
That said, she's a public figure who released these photos publicly. As I said, it is ridiculous to demand that these photos only be viewed when certain conditions are met. For this reason I feel it would be absurd to comply with her demands and in so doing encourage this sort of mentality.
I wasn't trying to drive you off man, you're opinion is as valid as anyone's. Personally I just think giving into these ridiculous demands sets a bad precedent.
@lemmynsfw.com
Pictures, gifs/webm, and videos of female celebrities
someone who is famous, especially in areas of entertainment such as films, music, writing, or sports
1. Instance-wide rules applied
2. Only Celebrities
3. The title is the name of the Celebrity
4. Only pictures, gifs/webm, or videos
5. No Leaked/Fake/Private Content
6. Mark NSFW if applied
7. No Watermarks/Heavy Edited/Filtered Content
go to feed...
@lemmynsfw.com
Pictures, gifs/webm, and videos of female celebrities
someone who is famous, especially in areas of entertainment such as films, music, writing, or sports
1. Instance-wide rules applied
2. Only Celebrities
3. The title is the name of the Celebrity
4. Only pictures, gifs/webm, or videos
5. No Leaked/Fake/Private Content
6. Mark NSFW if applied
7. No Watermarks/Heavy Edited/Filtered Content
go to feed...
Helluva cleavage
save