Microsoft is betting on small modular nuclear reactors to grow its energy infrastructure for training AI, a highly ambitious plan.
This seems kind of ideal though, computers provide a near constant load (relatively speaking) that combines very well with nuclear energy. Perhaps we should be asking why we haven’t already been doing this for the past decade?
Because it costs less money to push the cost to for taxpayers to subsidize it than owning it Correction
Those data centers are paying for their electrical usage. Economies of scale just make it more favorable for them over building their own power generation (solar/wind excluded).
This seems kind of ideal though, computers provide a near constant load (relatively speaking) that combines very well with nuclear energy.
Perhaps we should be asking why we haven’t already been doing this for the past decade?
save