YSK Why American-style suburbs are a Ponzi scheme

3 years ago by fadhl3y to c/youshouldknow

The first 100 people to use code SOMETHING at the link below will get 60% off of Incogni: https://incogni.com/somethingCheck out my Patreon: https://www.patr...

The financial unsustainability of traditional, car-centric American suburbs, consisting mainly of single-family units, is a critical aspect of the problem of urban sprawl. The design of these suburbs necessitates constant expansion into undeveloped land. This is because the initial infrastructure costs, such as roads, utilities, and public services, are often subsidized by development fees and future property taxes from new construction. However, as these communities age, the costs of maintaining and replacing this infrastructure can significantly exceed the revenue from property taxes, creating a financial shortfall. This is often referred to as a "growth Ponzi scheme" – new development brings in a temporary influx of revenue, which is used to pay for the cost of existing liabilities, but in the process, incurs even more long-term liabilities.

Moreover, the dispersed, low-density nature of these suburbs compounds the issue, leading to inefficient public service delivery and increased per capita costs. The reliance on private vehicles, due to large distances between residences, workplaces, and essential amenities, also places a heavy financial burden on families, particularly those in lower income brackets. Affordable housing options are limited, contributing to socio-economic segregation. Furthermore, the conversion of natural and agricultural land into residential and commercial areas can lead to losses in ecosystem services, the costs of which are often not accounted for. Thus, from both a municipal and a resident perspective, traditional American suburbs present a financially unsustainable model for urban development.

d00phy 10 points 3 years ago

I’ll have to watch this later. At first I thought it was from the Not Just Bikes channel, which has a similar message.

path: 0 546755, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 2
NotAPenguin 3 points 3 years ago

This youtuber is friends with NJB :)

path: 0 546755 548492, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
sharkfeek 3 points 3 years ago

Same, I thought a new video dropped

path: 0 546755 547742, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
dystop 6 points 3 years ago

The suburb model is an easy way to give people more land, but it is highly, highly inefficient.

path: 0 545040, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
Turkey_Titty_city 6 points 3 years ago

It's not really a ponzi scheme... it's a desire for affluence and social exclusion from people who are different than you.

People love conformity, hence why every new development is in a HOA.

path: 0 548544, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 2
Addica 9 points 3 years ago

Its kind of both, the growth pattern is not sustainable in any metric. Focusing only on the now without caring for the future upkeep is very shortsighted development

path: 0 548544 549398, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 0
sadreality 8 points 3 years ago
path: 0 548544 550014, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
Roggie 3 points 3 years ago

This is all true, but doesn’t offer much of a solution or any alternatives. If I think about the concept of essentially living in a megabuilding from cyberpunk, I wouldn’t trust my fellow man to be clean enough to keep it from looking like the mega buildings from cyberpunk. Plus, cramming people into close quarters accelerates the transmission of disease, which would be problematic given how unclean I would expect such a place to be. It’s not that I disagree with these statements, urban sprawl is a problem.

path: 0 547406, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 3
Greenskye 9 points 3 years ago

The concept you're looking for is called the 'missing middle'. People assume the only two options are single family home suburbs or inner city mega apartments.

What's missing are small mixed areas (which are illegal to build in most of the US) that have single family homes, duplexes, small apartment buildings, all mixed in with commercial spaces like grocery stores and restaurants.

path: 0 547406 548687, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 2
RBWells 4 points 3 years ago

I actually live in one of these, in a county with absolute dedication to sprawl and hellish suburbs. A neighborhood, yes? Apartments by the river, houses and with restaurants and gas station and drugstore within walking distance and without crossing a main road. About 3 miles from downtown and the other main business district. Uptown, sort of? Not fancy but same sort of location.

But to buy a not new house right now, in my neighborhood of average houses, would cost half a million dollars. To rent, unless you are old and can get into the rent controlled senior highrise, 2k-3k a month for an apartment, 4-6k a month for a house. That is not reasonable for average pay here at all.

path: 0 547406 548687 550348, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
derf82 2 points 3 years ago

It isn’t “illegal.” I work in development as a civil engineer and there is a ton of mixed use development. The 5 over 1 building, with retail in the lower level and several floors of apartments are huge right now.

But it doesn’t solve a lot of issues. We still need cars to get to work and get services we can’t get locally. Consumer preferences drive a lot of it as well. While some people prefer living car free, many do not. Many prefer single family homes with yards

path: 0 547406 548687 550346, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
stephenc -16 points 3 years ago
path: 0 548032, hotness: undefined, score: -16, children: 12
DealBreaker 15 points 3 years ago

There's no way you are not a troll lmao

path: 0 548032 548987, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 0
Skyler 14 points 3 years ago

Yeah, because remote suburbs are just perfect for disabled people with mobility issues. 👍

path: 0 548032 549496, hotness: undefined, score: 14, children: 0
sadreality 6 points 3 years ago
path: 0 548032 549961, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
kitonthenet -4 points 3 years ago

(((Inner city crime))) (((wealthy cosmopolitan elites)))

path: 0 548032 548469, hotness: undefined, score: -4, children: 2
chaogomu 12 points 3 years ago

Usually, the multiple parenthesis are used to dog whistle "Jews", but this guy was dog whistling "black people".

I'm not sure if there's a way to sarcastic indicate that form of stupidity...

Anyway, for those who don't know, "white flight" to the suburbs started almost exactly the same time that segregation was ended. What a coincidence. Particularly the desegregation of schools.

Speaking of the desegregation of schools, the forced desegregation of certain white only universities was the start of the religious right in politics, not Roe v Wade, which was decided some 7 or so years earlier.

path: 0 548032 548469 549008, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 1
kitonthenet 6 points 3 years ago

He was dogwhistling both I think, “the wealthy elites landowners are promoting racemixing tricking good people to move back into the crime filled cities” is pretty explicit even for this type

path: 0 548032 548469 549008 550020, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
NotAPenguin -7 points 3 years ago

So much bullshit I don't even know where to begin.

I suggest that anyone interested in this topic watches this playlist which goes into the economics (and much more) about why current American planning doesn't work and is destroying the US:

https://youtu.be/...

path: 0 548032 548348, hotness: undefined, score: -7, children: 5
stephenc -15 points 3 years ago
path: 0 548032 548348 548391, hotness: undefined, score: -15, children: 4
Maven 26 points 3 years ago

I'll never understand how anyone could say cities are ableist in the slightest. Less cars means you're more free to just go places, walking or otherwise, so it's safer for people with vision or hearing disabilities. More public transit means it's easier for everyone else to get places. If you can't use your legs, you can't drive anyway... Now you don't have to. Plus public transit costs a lot less to the user to do because you don't need to pay for a whole car and so on which is great for people with limited money options due to having a disability.

It's really dumb to say public transit and walkable cities is capitalist stink given that there's a really long recorded history of capitalist stinks trying to ban cities from being walkable... And it working... It's a big reason American cities suck so bad now.

path: 0 548032 548348 548391 549712, hotness: undefined, score: 26, children: 1
kitonthenet 0 points 3 years ago

I mean they’re not strictly speaking more accessible in an absolute sense because everyone has different, often conflicting, accessibility needs. What I need may be less accessible for you etc, but overall they are more accessible in that there’s far more options that provide far more opportunities for different strategies toward accessibility.

For example stairs might not be accessible for me, but if I go just fifty meters or so an elevator is right there, and there’s a ramp etc.

path: 0 548032 548348 548391 549712 550275, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 0
mightyfoolish 8 points 3 years ago

But everyone can't drive. I just don't see how cities=capitalism? What makes a suburb more socialist than a city?

path: 0 548032 548348 548391 550252, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
NotAPenguin -9 points 3 years ago

The videos look at the facts and sources their claims, like actual budgets and where the money is coming from is shown.
If you aren't willing to look at the facts then maybe you shouldn't be talking about the subject?

Cities where stuff is close together and there's public transport is obviously better for disabled people than being stuck far away from everything and having to drive(which many people can't) to do anything?

path: 0 548032 548348 548391 550272, hotness: undefined, score: -9, children: 0
youshouldknow
youshouldknow

@lemmy.world

login for more options
47931
781
4121

YSK - for all the things that can make your life easier!

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with YSK.

All posts must begin with YSK. If you're a Mastodon user, then include YSK after @youshouldknow. This is a community to share tips and tricks that will help you improve your life.



Rule 2- Your post body text must include the reason **WHY** YSK:

In your post's text body, you must include the reason "Why" YSK: It’s helpful for readability, and informs readers about the importance of the content.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-YSK posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-YSK posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

If you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.

Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- The majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Rule 11- Posts must actually be true:

Disinformation, trolling, and being misleading will not be tolerated. Repeated or egregious attempts will earn you a ban. This also applies to filing reports: If you continually file false reports YOU WILL BE BANNED! We can see who reports what, and shenanigans will not be tolerated. We are not here to ban people who said something you don't like.



Rule 12- Linking directly to a video as a source is not acceptable.

Video only posts are responsible for an outsized portion of rules violations. Your post must contain text and meet the requirements of the previous rules.



Rule 13- If you file a report, include what specific rule is being violated and how.

Partnered Communities:

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

Credits

Our icon(masterpiece) was made by @clen15!

go to feed...