Brave fork without crypto crap?

3 years ago by WeLoveCastingSpelz to c/privacyguides

I have been thinking about switching to brave for better fingerprinting protection

poVoq 81 points 3 years ago

So Chromium?

Just use Firefox, its the better browser anyways.

path: 0 629229, hotness: undefined, score: 81, children: 18
bionicjoey 21 points 3 years ago

Almost all of my Linux devices have both chromium-browser and Firefox installed. Firefox is my default, but there are some apps out there that work a lot better in something chromium-based.

path: 0 629229 629429, hotness: undefined, score: 21, children: 7
animist 11 points 3 years ago

Ungoogled-chromium is a good substitute in that case

path: 0 629229 629429 629790, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 6
stonemilker 9 points 3 years ago path: 0 629229 629429 629790 630061, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 5
animist 6 points 3 years ago

Thank you for sharing this, I was unaware. I wonder if any of this has been addressed recently as the linked article is two years old (not demeaning its value, just wondering if the devs saw the article and decided to improve ungoogled-chromium).

path: 0 629229 629429 629790 630061 632408, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 2
rmicielski 2 points 3 years ago

No one is going to develop exploits only for a browser with certain default security options disabled (especially these made at compile time using toolchain). Binary exploitation is hard, and extremely not worth the effort in this case.

path: 0 629229 629429 629790 630061 633799, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
BrikoX 15 points 3 years ago

Brave might have started as a basic Chromium fork, but the various privacy/security features they added do make them standout now.

path: 0 629229 629340, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 2
naoseiquemsou 13 points 3 years ago

But they still contribute to google's monopoly over web standards.

path: 0 629229 629340 636568, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 0
SatyrSack 9 points 3 years ago

It is really disingenuous to say "X is just a skin of Y" just because they share the same browser engine or are forked from the same browser. Like you say, there are a lot of changes.

path: 0 629229 629340 629453, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 0
xavier666 13 points 3 years ago

Aye Firefox gang 🦊🤘

path: 0 629229 631843, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 0
WeLoveCastingSpelz 9 points 3 years ago

I already use Firefox but brave is just better at fingerprinting protection

path: 0 629229 631978, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 4
underscores 11 points 3 years ago

There's CanvasBlocker for Firefox that can do fingerprint protection.

path: 0 629229 631978 632531, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 3
milk 6 points 3 years ago

Arkenfox is also good at protection from naive fingerprinting

path: 0 629229 631978 632531 633055, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
BrikoX 2 points 3 years ago

Adding add-on makes you more fingerprintable, not less.

path: 0 629229 631978 632531 644193, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
underscores 3 points 3 years ago

It depends. Many addons have effects that can be tested for and fingerprinted, but it's not always straight forward. There's a way to detect any specific chrome extension, but doesn't work on firefox because it uses unique extension ids per person.

With addons like CanvasBlocker, they generate random values for a bunch of apis like canvas. So each time you will look unique, but it changes every time so you're not easily tracked. I'd assume it's similar to what Brave does, but I haven't looked into the details. Some stuff isn't randomized by default, so they can get info like timezone and languages, but probably not enough to give you a unique identity.

path: 0 629229 631978 632531 644193 660028, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
BigTechBlows 2 points 3 years ago
path: 0 629229 632015, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
fenndev 36 points 3 years ago

Why not use Librewolf? Fork of Firefox, hardened and resists fingerprinting. Scores pretty damn well on https://privacytests.org and pairs well with Mull on Android.

AFAIK there are no actively developed Brave forks.

path: 0 634010, hotness: undefined, score: 36, children: 3
WeLoveCastingSpelz 9 points 3 years ago

I use librewolf on my work laptop it removes all cookies every time you close it, this wouldn't be a problem on mobile as I already set my phone browser(fennec) to do that but on my personal computer it crosses the border from I can deal with it to too inconvenient

path: 0 634010 634011, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 1
priapus 16 points 3 years ago

You can turn that off in the settings

path: 0 634010 634011 634165, hotness: undefined, score: 16, children: 0
Mihuy 6 points 3 years ago

And there won't be because brave doesn't like it when someone forks the browser.

path: 0 634010 646861, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
boonhet 25 points 3 years ago

Firefox. Or if you don't want to spend time configuring it, Librewolf.

path: 0 647129, hotness: undefined, score: 25, children: 2
andrew0 9 points 3 years ago path: 0 647129 648565, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 1
boy 4 points 3 years ago

The only issue with librewolf is that updates sometimes take a few days. For that reason I’m still using ff+arkenfox

path: 0 647129 648565 724074, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
BrikoX 23 points 3 years ago

All of the crypo crap can be turned off in settings.

path: 0 629349, hotness: undefined, score: 23, children: 3
Double_A 18 points 3 years ago

And the setting really does work. The crap is completely gone afterwards. There is no grayed out symbols, or nag screens or anything.

path: 0 629349 629883, hotness: undefined, score: 18, children: 0
DuckGuy 4 points 3 years ago

Or more accurately: can be turned on. Everything crypto is disabled by default.

path: 0 629349 660784, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 1
BrikoX 3 points 3 years ago

Functionality wise yes, but it's visible in the UI and frontpage and that can be disabled/removed .

path: 0 629349 660784 661538, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
privacyfalcon9899 18 points 3 years ago

Just switch off brave rewards and sponsored content. And, your fork is ready.

path: 0 659285, hotness: undefined, score: 18, children: 0
Makeshift 14 points 3 years ago

I agree the crypto stuff is super annoying, but it's a really nice and clean browser after you disable all that and tweak the settings (which you'd probably want to go through and configure with a new browser anyway)

path: 0 631955, hotness: undefined, score: 14, children: 1
Lid 5 points 3 years ago

even as a crypto user & dev, brave's crypto shit is annoying af, it's inferior by far to what everyone else uses & they push it on ur face & make u have to remove it.

i'd rather just use firefox or even microsoft edge, even for crypto stuff

path: 0 631955 641635, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
freddy 12 points 3 years ago

We recommend just switching to Brave and disabling the 'crytpo crap' yourself rather than using a fork that is liable to go unmaintained and miss updates.

path: 0 648686, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 1
deafboy 6 points 3 years ago

So much this. I've seen countless of spite forks. Very few of them merged the updates.

Even large projects like Electron can't keep up with chromium, and then there is downstream crap like Discord that can't even keep up witch Electron.

path: 0 648686 660787, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
Relected 10 points 3 years ago
path: 0 629918, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 5
WeLoveCastingSpelz 1 point 3 years ago

That's what I have been doing

path: 0 629918 632008, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
webghost0101 0 points 3 years ago

Why not both? Firefox for sites you login. Brave configured with auto delete cookies for a fast fresh empty internet every time.

path: 0 629918 633012, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 3
Relected 3 points 3 years ago
path: 0 629918 633012 635249, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 2
Relected 2 points 3 years ago
path: 0 629918 633012 635249 645630, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
webghost0101 0 points 3 years ago

Literally all browsers can do that but do you really want to logins everywhere every single time?

Thats what using 2 browsers can solve. I can use brave fully anonymously. While still being logged in on lemmy and others on firefox,

I am also using an auto accept all cookies script to remove all the cookie banners for every site. As they are deleted every instance anyway. I would never use that on the same browser i enter personal information.

path: 0 629918 633012 635249 644240, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 0
nomadic 8 points 3 years ago

If you want Brave without the crypto crap then spend a minute or two and turn it all off in settings. You'll never see it again.

path: 0 641163, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 1
EarlTurlet 8 points 3 years ago

Except on Android, unfortunately. The overflow menu is full of all of those features right at the bottom -- prime thumb real estate.

path: 0 641163 641264, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
wasd4321 7 points 3 years ago

firefox with betterfox user.js is my recommendation

path: 0 648177, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
zlatiah 5 points 3 years ago

If fingerprint protection is what I want, LibreWolf comes with a very sensible default as compared to stock Firefox. If I am familiar enough with about.config and stuff then hardened Firefox can reach bonkers levels of privacy as well

If a Chromium-based browser is required that has Brave's level of privacy protection but none of the crypto nonsense... Yeah I'm not aware of any as of right now. Maybe once the Duckduckgo Browser becomes available?

path: 0 634346, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 1
WeLoveCastingSpelz 2 points 3 years ago

well all the signs are pointing to librewolf I prefer gecko engine to chrominum, gonna give it a try

path: 0 634346 634347, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
TWeaK 5 points 3 years ago

Bromite used to be great, but unfortunately the dev seems to have abandoned it.

I've seen people talking about Mull, Mulch, Fulguris and a couple others. I think Mulch is tied to a specific Android ROM, and the others are Firefox forks.

path: 0 631045, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 12
WeLoveCastingSpelz 4 points 3 years ago

I use fennec as my regular browser on android and mulch as the webview implementation

path: 0 631045 632126, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 2
fenndev 2 points 3 years ago

As a heads up, I believe Fennec is the old codebase for Firefox and it's no longer being actively maintained AFAIK.

Unless, of course, you're using the Fennec Browser built by F-Droid, which is confusingly based on the new Fenix codebase.

path: 0 631045 632126 633915, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
WeLoveCastingSpelz 3 points 3 years ago

I use the one from fdroid it does get updated often enough

path: 0 631045 632126 633915 633916, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
dadbeard 3 points 3 years ago path: 0 631045 633461, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 3
TWeaK 1 point 3 years ago

I literally saw a link in a thread on the OG's github earlier today, sounds like this will be my new switch.

Although I'm still going to give Mulch a try, with a ROM that has it integrated into webview.

path: 0 631045 633461 633475, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 2
Medalist 2 points 3 years ago

DivestOS is the only Android ROM I know of that integrates the Mulch webview. But Tad (DivestOS dev) also builds standalone binaries of Mulch that can be installed independently- just add their repo into f-droid or something like droidify and you're good to go. Link: https://divestos.org/fdroid/official

path: 0 631045 633461 633475 644623, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
TWeaK 1 point 3 years ago

Great, I'll give that a try first. Still probably going to try DivestOS as well anyway, just for a fresh change.

path: 0 631045 633461 633475 644623 645943, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
pootriarch 3 points 3 years ago path: 0 631045 631404, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 3
TWeaK 7 points 3 years ago

I wouldn't want Brave on anything myself. The company has proven it isn't trustworthy many times over.

path: 0 631045 631404 631514, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 2
pootriarch 6 points 3 years ago

i agree, but my unpopular opinion is that mozilla has also proven this repeatedly, with nothing and nobody being universally better. privacy people love firefox, but i spend a lot of time with each major version's release notes figuring out how to undo the new telemetry (increasing integration with pocket, firefox suggest, location that won't turn off).

my threat model is 'they're all evil, including mozilla', so there are additional rings around everything

path: 0 631045 631404 631514 631932, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 1
manny_stillwagon 2 points 3 years ago

LibreWolf is a nice upgrade in that regard. A Firefox fork where they remove a ton of that nonsense and improve some privacy settings.

FYI, they are also on Lemmy.

path: 0 631045 631404 631514 631932 636647, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
dngray 2 points 3 years ago

Mulch is tied to a specific Android ROM

Yes, that's because it requires webview to be patched, it's the same reason that Vanadium is only available for GrapheneOS. They do use some of Vanadium's patches though.

path: 0 631045 636812, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
ch1cken 5 points 3 years ago

well, brave's crypto is opt in anyways, it wont be used unless you manually enable it yourself

Firefox paired with arkenfox's userjs, or librewolf which basically configures all of that for you, are also good options.

path: 0 636512, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
Vertelleus 5 points 3 years ago path: 0 634021, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 3
combustible_lemon_engineer 8 points 3 years ago

That site and testing is run by a Brave employee, right? I'd be very skeptical of Brave's high scores.

path: 0 634021 636518, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
goryramsy 7 points 3 years ago

That's with firefox on default settings. If you turn it on to 'strict' and install uBlock, then it wins.

path: 0 634021 636524, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
WeLoveCastingSpelz 2 points 3 years ago

yup thats the reason I wanna switch to it but damn wish there was a good fork that removed the bloat

path: 0 634021 634072, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
Clocker108 4 points 3 years ago path: 0 651752, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
MarioBarisa 4 points 3 years ago

At that point just use Firefox / Librewolf, os just turn off all of the brave rewards crap ( crypto )...

path: 0 729734, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
imrichyouknow 3 points 3 years ago

To me, Brave or DuckDuckGo are as malicious as Google

path: 0 645585, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 2
dbx12 3 points 3 years ago
path: 0 645585 646940, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
imrichyouknow 6 points 3 years ago

They are less invasive on the privacy front, but they also push their products much harder down user's throat due to less revenue from less accurate ads, just look at DDG's frontpage.

I also found them self-censoring towards IPs from China, albeit this could be the direct result of using Bing's search results.

It's much easier to compare it with something like SearXNG which has the same core principle, without ads, without censorships, without invasive marketing.

path: 0 645585 646940 647200, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
Brunette6256 3 points 3 years ago

The mulvad browser?

path: 0 641955, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
WeLoveCastingSpelz 4 points 3 years ago

The solution I chooses is using that along with hardened Firefox

path: 0 641955 646534, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
Qvest 3 points 3 years ago

If you don’t need chromium, try the Mullvad browser. It has the same protection but no crypto. It’s a fork of tor browser without the tor network

path: 0 629153, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
deFrisselle 3 points 3 years ago

Never noticed the crypto stuff Don't use it Also, I use Vivaldi

path: 0 648054, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
breadsmasher 1 point 3 years ago path: 0 629270, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
klarker 1 point 3 years ago

Just follow guides on turn it off "crap" that you don't want.

path: 0 645312, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
xe3 1 point 3 years ago

You can just disable it in settings, fairly easily. This is preferable to searching for an obscure fork of brave (for me personally).

path: 0 818797, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
privacyfalcon9899 1 point 3 years ago
path: 0 659262, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Castor 0 points 3 years ago

Never trust anything that comes anywhere near crypto. Firefox with the Electronic Frontier Foundation's privacy badger plugin and a good adblocker is the way to go. https://privacybadger.org/

path: 0 977295, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 1
r7vil50j 2 points 3 years ago

Why is crypto so bad? Please explain.

path: 0 977295 977296, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
privacyguides
privacyguides

@lemmy.one

login for more options
18764
647
3

In the digital age, protecting your personal information might seem like an impossible task. We’re here to help.

This is a community for sharing news about privacy, posting information about cool privacy tools and services, and getting advice about your privacy journey.


You can subscribe to this community from any Kbin or Lemmy instance:

Learn more...


Check out our website at privacyguides.org before asking your questions here. We've tried answering the common questions and recommendations there!

Want to get involved? The website is open-source on GitHub, and your help would be appreciated!


This community is the "official" Privacy Guides community on Lemmy, which can be verified here. Other "Privacy Guides" communities on other Lemmy servers are not moderated by this team or associated with the website.


Moderation Rules:

  1. We prefer posting about open-source software whenever possible.
  2. This is not the place for self-promotion if you are not listed on privacyguides.org. If you want to be listed, make a suggestion on our forum first.
  3. No soliciting engagement: Don't ask for upvotes, follows, etc.
  4. Surveys, Fundraising, and Petitions must be pre-approved by the mod team.
  5. Be civil, no violence, hate speech. Assume people here are posting in good faith.
  6. Don't repost topics which have already been covered here.
  7. News posts must be related to privacy and security, and your post title must match the article headline exactly. Do not editorialize titles, you can post your opinions in the post body or a comment.
  8. Memes/images/video posts that could be summarized as text explanations should not be posted. Infographics and conference talks from reputable sources are acceptable.
  9. No help vampires: This is not a tech support subreddit, don't abuse our community's willingness to help. Questions related to privacy, security or privacy/security related software and their configurations are acceptable.
  10. No misinformation: Extraordinary claims must be matched with evidence.
  11. Do not post about VPNs or cryptocurrencies which are not listed on privacyguides.org. See Rule 2 for info on adding new recommendations to the website.
  12. General guides or software lists are not permitted. Original sources and research about specific topics are allowed as long as they are high quality and factual. We are not providing a platform for poorly-vetted, out-of-date or conflicting recommendations.

Additional Resources:

go to feed...