You Have a Right to Know Why a Health Insurer Denied Your Claim. Some Insurers Still Won’t Tell You.

3 years ago by spaceghoti to c/politics

Federal regulations require insurers to promptly hand over records to patients facing claim denials. Some insurers only turned over their files after ProPublica reached out.

Federal law and regulations require insurers to hand over exactly this sort of information in response to a written request. And they have to do it fast: Most people who get insurance through an employer should get the records, called claim files, within 30 days.

There’s just one catch: Some insurers aren’t turning files over like they’re supposed to. We followed ProPublica readers through the process with five different insurers. Several companies only shared documents with patients after we reached out.

Kbobabob 79 points 3 years ago

I'd rather have a system that didn't allow an insurance company decide who is worth saving and who isn't.

path: 0 5189989, hotness: undefined, score: 79, children: 1
PunnyName 15 points 3 years ago

So let's do both for now.

path: 0 5189989 5190025, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 0
krayj 69 points 3 years ago

I don't even understand why there is a burden on the part of the insured to have to make a written request for this.

If you have a claim that is denied, the insurer should be required to provide the full details and reasons for the denial automatically at the time of the denial.

path: 0 5189870, hotness: undefined, score: 69, children: 9
PunnyName 34 points 3 years ago

They shouldn't even be able to deny you as easily as they can. They can basically do it for no damned reason.

path: 0 5189870 5190725, hotness: undefined, score: 34, children: 7
sudo 11 points 3 years ago

They shouldn't exist

path: 0 5189870 5190725 5203986, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 6
PunnyName 3 points 3 years ago

Agreed. But at the moment, they exist, so we have to work with the hand we're dealt, while also trying to build a better system.

path: 0 5189870 5190725 5203986 5222946, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 5
ComradePorkRoll 3 points 3 years ago

How about we make them not exist? No concessions with those who profit off of the sick as we distantle and restructure the healthcare system.

path: 0 5189870 5190725 5203986 5222946 5223869, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 3
shalafi 1 point 3 years ago

Next to climate change, this seems our most intractable American problem.

path: 0 5189870 5190725 5203986 5222946 5225162, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
AnonTwo 10 points 3 years ago

My guess is the company wants a lawyer present because they assume that anyone who is requesting this is probably going to bring one as well.

Basically they don't hire people they would authorize to tell you the reason.

path: 0 5189870 5190719, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 0
cmg 11 points 3 years ago

This process is such a nightmare.

N letters back and forth then a bill stage where you realize something wasn’t paid for. Then an hour long phone call to start an appeal process asking for more documentation about a test ordered 5 months ago. The denials are handwaves.

Insurance in general is such a nightmare. I’m in the fortunate bucket where I’m well paid and have a decent plan. One kid with chronic conditions. Then the pain of every year being forced to figure out the different game.

path: 0 5221024, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 1
shalafi 2 points 3 years ago

Still beats letting the government make my health care decisions.

I'd much rather a profit-driven company be entrusted to do the right thing. That way if I don't like their decision, I can go fuck myself.

path: 0 5221024 5225091, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
politics
politics

@lemmy.world

login for more options
31469
34159
9454

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

go to feed...