Donald Trump's lawyers again ask for early verdict in civil fraud trial, judge says 'no way'

3 years ago by MicroWave to c/news

Trump's lawyers have rested his defense and have sought again to immediately end the New York civil fraud trial that threatens the former president's real estate empire. The judge said "there's no way I'm going to grant that."

Donald Trump’s lawyers rested his defense Tuesday and sought anew to immediately end the New York civil fraud trial that threatens the former president’s real estate empire. The judge said “there’s no way I’m going to grant that.”

Trump’s lawyers — thwarted in a similar bid last month — were swatted down as they asked Judge Arthur Engoron to cut the trial short and issue a verdict clearing Trump, his company and top executives of wrongdoing. The judge reiterated his feeling that state lawyers had met their legal burden for seeing the three-month trial through to its conclusion.

New York Attorney General Letitia James alleges Trump duped banks, insurers and others by inflating his wealth on financial statements used in securing loans and make deals. Engoron has already ruled on James’ top claim that Trump committed fraud.

FuglyDuck 39 points 3 years ago

FTA:

The judge said “there’s no way I’m going to grant that.”

"We're going to consider everything."
"BUT JUDGE THAT"S PREJUDICIAL TO OUR CASE!"
"That's why we're considering it. Dipshit."

path: 0 6007770, hotness: undefined, score: 39, children: 3
Tar_alcaran 16 points 3 years ago

Its like watching Liar Liar play out in real life.

path: 0 6007770 6009812, hotness: undefined, score: 16, children: 1
NateNate60 17 points 3 years ago

It's like when you are presenting random evidence in Ace Attorney because you have no fucking idea what's going on, except the judge isn't legally allowed to just throw his hands up and say "fuck it, guilty" after you fail five times

path: 0 6007770 6009812 6009948, hotness: undefined, score: 17, children: 0
lolcatnip 1 point 3 years ago

It's prejudicial to their case.

path: 0 6007770 6022529, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
gregorum 17 points 3 years ago

Are Trump’s lawyers just doing stand-up now?

path: 0 6009894, hotness: undefined, score: 17, children: 2
lolcatnip 4 points 3 years ago

Always have been.

path: 0 6009894 6022511, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
orbitz 1 point 3 years ago

I think it's just repeats.

path: 0 6009894 6026498, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
FawkesGil 10 points 3 years ago

Ripbozo

path: 0 6007310, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 0
TheJims 7 points 3 years ago

The verdict is Trump is a Fraud and a Cheat

path: 0 6027070, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
shalafi 5 points 3 years ago

Trump ordered them to and they did so. That's about it.

path: 0 6026082, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
Sami_Uso 2 points 3 years ago

Can anyone enlighten a legal-dummy about what the most likely outcome is? Like what can we honestly expect to happen, not just best case scenario. I just don't see a world where this dude actually faces punishment, right?

path: 0 6026785, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 2
Patches 5 points 3 years ago

Can anyone predict the future?

Anyone claiming they can shouldn't be trusted.

path: 0 6026785 6030450, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 1
Sami_Uso 5 points 3 years ago

Well, there can't be infinite possibilities, I'm assuming? Just sort of wondering if anyone could comment on what they thought the most likely outcome might be.

Is that really asking someone to predict the future?

path: 0 6026785 6030450 6031126, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
news
news

@lemmy.world

login for more options
39591
40379
9528

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.

Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.

If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.

All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

go to feed...