That post seems to be missing.
load all comments
Corgana 62 points 3 years ago

I was pleased to see Lemmy get a shout out in the Verge's recent "Case for the Fediverse" article. I wonder if it attracted anyone new.

path: 0 6228151, hotness: undefined, score: 62, children: 13
helenslunch 35 points 3 years ago
path: 0 6228151 6228317, hotness: undefined, score: 35, children: 0
Fungah -18 points 3 years ago

I don't want a huge influx of users. Lemmy is good. I like Lemmy. A flood of people enshitify it.

path: 0 6228151 6231935, hotness: undefined, score: -18, children: 11
postmateDumbass 19 points 3 years ago

A nice slow growth pattern would be nice.

path: 0 6228151 6231935 6232780, hotness: undefined, score: 19, children: 1
PuddingFeeling907 15 points 3 years ago

We would get more financial support for third party apps and more content.

path: 0 6228151 6231935 6233092, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 0
lugal 10 points 3 years ago

In my opinion, it's not growth in users that's the problem but in capital. The more the platform wants to earn, the shittier it gets. And since lemmy isn't going to earn anything, it ain't get shitty

path: 0 6228151 6231935 6238453, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 3
stevehobbes 8 points 3 years ago

Lemmy broadly is very group-think right now. There isnโ€™t a large diversity of opinion yet; growth would be good - the real issue is when you have actually saturated a market, the only way to grow is through increasingly shitty things (see: reddit). Lemmy wonโ€™t have those same problems because the commercial model is so different (non-existent).

path: 0 6228151 6231935 6249742, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 3

thanks for using Leebra!

go to feed...