The more rules,the more AI the text becomes. So I expect a scientific text with very rigit rules in how to write is practically indistinguishable from an AI text, if written good. So tue expected value is 50% AI or human, if the text is well written. Either the AI got less rules (making it more AI) or humans make mistakes. Either way, a perfectly written text will land at 50% chance.

This looks pretty devilish... Like devils hoofs... I like it! If I would be a woman I would wear them in church... Hell, even as a man I would wear them in church!

Hilt looks like an undercover version of some austrian artist...Even the name looks like a wanky undercover versionXD

Europe has a thing called solidarism, but capitalism starts to win here too...

So Homelander defines good? The "the boys" equivalent of superman.

Man, you are the superior one, because you are still using a real Computer

In that case don't go with the masses. It's a human weakness to do so and is the reason why political votes often land one side heavy although this would not be democratic in the end. This is also the reason why democratic votes are anonymised to prevent this natural human behaviour of going with the masses but it does not work wither to prevent it.

Well, we wanted free will. This is what we got...

But who defines good?

First of all, we are a product of it. We also demand nutrition, like any other animal. We work by the same principles like any other animal. We just have a large neocortex, which allows us to solve complex problems, which other animals cannot. We use this to our advantage like any other animal would do. I am not saying that it is the right thing we are doing but we grew out of primitivism and have much more complex problems at hand now, which mainly need us to reject our tribal behaviour and move past it. Many of these large problems are due to our tribalism. Why should we care about the world? We care about our loved ones only. Why should I give money to people I do not know? I would rather give it to my close ones. Everything else is a potential threat. Our tribalism doesn't function properly at this scale and we have to move past it somehow, while it is deeply natural for us to behave like this and it's at small scale also beneficial and not harmful to others.

But where goes the power abuse by the rich then?

Then the mother wonders why her child draws such grim picturesXD

Nature Documentary Narrator: "The Human. A peculiar specimin within the primate kingdom..."

I actually would love a Nature Documentary style explanation about humans, as if they were just another species spotlighted in their documentary seriesXD

But also the people of the future won't be perfect and will generate an imbalance again. The cycle continues in the end.

Mods be like:

But I am wondering what is with rikers beard...

Capitalism is dominant and longer used than Communism. The total amount of deaths is naturally higher. It doesn't tell anything about the actual amount of deaths communism could have, if it is active in the same capacity and amount of time, this plot would be more interesting.

And just to make things clear, I am not taking a position for any of the two. I just think this argument is not representative.

Green is fucking a dead animal afterwards, because it fits greys explanation and is the morally allowed one. That's why green explicitely needs to msntion that they are proud.

They did it in advance and it gets automatically send when their heart stops beating.

It is true. Specific types of cheese like emmentaler have high content in tryptophan, which can become serotonin in the brain. This allows for similar results like MDMA or other serotonin influencing stuff but only in theory. Tryptophan is an amino acid. So it also goes to other reactions but the tryptophan coming from cheese seems to get to a higher percentage to the brain.

Ethanol. A disinfectant and neurotoxine. Glad to help.