155
60
Anyone

@slrpnk.net

Anyone 49 points 2 years ago

@queermunist@lemmy.ml

@rimu@piefed.social

Mr. Obermann may have a business interest here, but his remarks regarding Russia's economy are absolutely valid. Putin has turned Russia into a 'war economy' with the whole country depending on war. Even Russian economists -including from the Central Bank- warn that the country will be facing difficult times if peace breaks out (which may also mean it would be difficult for Putin to stay in power as soon as the war ends and there is no enemy anymore).

So Obermann's comment that "the internal pressure [in Russia] to deliver new victories through military conquest likely will grow", is very real. Putin put his country on a war path for the long term. For example, Russia's defense minister is an economist claiming that war would be a requirement for economic growth (this is, of course, complete rubbish, but this comes from Russia's government).

I wrote a comment regarding Russia's economy in a different thread and don't want to repeat it, so here is the link if you are interested: https://slrpnk.net/post/19670037/14488418

path: 0 16048823 16048997, hotness: undefined, score: 49, children: 9
Anyone 34 points 2 years ago

In particular, he aims to target the European Union in response to its value-added tax (VAT), which applies to all products and is viewed by Washington as a non-tariff barrier.

What? This makes no economic sense.

Can someone enlighten me what this is about?

path: 0 15084326, hotness: undefined, score: 34, children: 4
Anyone 31 points 2 years ago

Is it really worth it building yet another model?

Yes, it is, and it has to do with independence and many other reasons. It'll be multilingual, legally compliant, it comes without Chinese nor other censorship, it is open source unlike Deepseek, ChatGPT, and others.

path: 0 14919200 14919324, hotness: undefined, score: 31, children: 4
Anyone 24 points 2 years ago

It's an interesting article from a unusual point of view (and an unusual source).

From a macroeconomic point of view, a major problem for Russia’s civilian industry could be a lack of labour (in addition to what the article suggests regarding returning soldiers' psychological problems), as stated by several (Russian) economists. And even Russian media admitted that private companies in other sectors than military are operating at around 80% of capacity due to a lack of labour. According to the Russian consultancy Yakov and Partners, Russia could reach a worker shortage of 2 to 4 million people by 2030.

Another problem for Russia on the economic road to peace could be the banks. Sberbank and TVB, both state-owned, have been required by law to fund companies from the military complex at state-subsidised rates, not in the least because Russia’s central bank had to raise interest rates to 21% to curb a devastating inflation. Some other sectors (agriculture, construction) also benefited from state-sponsored lower-than-market rates (these public funds does not count as Russia’s official budget of 40% for military spending afaik).

According to official numbers by the bank of Russia, this led to an increase of profits for both Sberbank and VTB, but these loans -which essentially means that banks could 'mint' a large amount of money within a short time span - now amount to 16% of Russian commercial banks’ total assets. This poses a high risk to the banking sector, and it increases once the war is over and peace breaks out. Central Bank Governor Elvira Nabiullina has warned already late last year that the Russian banking sector’s capital adequacy ratio has dropped by 2 percentage points in the course of 2024, reaching 12.5%. (Simply speaking, the Capital Adequacy Ratio is a metric used by regulators around the globe measuring a bank’s ability to absorb a sufficient amount of loss before they loose depositor funds.) Russia’s ratio is still above the minimum requirement under the so-called Basel III rules (which is 10.5% if I am not mistaken), but the drop is significant, meaning that Russian banks could be quickly running out of cushion to avoid insolvency once the situation changes.

Russia has also lost its most important economic lifeline, oil and gas, and Europe won’t come back as buyers given that the Kremlin is posing a threat to the continent.

And all this must be seen as even now, as the war is raging, the Russian economy, despite coming from a relatively low level, is already slowing down. The IMF expects a growth rate of 1.3% this year and 1.2% in 2026. Some time ago, Russian economist Natalia Zubarevich said that in Russia “there will be no collapses, but rather a viscous, slow sinking into backwardness.” Maybe she is right?

[Edit typo.]

path: 0 15770827, hotness: undefined, score: 24, children: 2
Anyone 22 points 2 years ago

FoxNews' Watters on American TV: "We are not in high school. We don't need friends ... if we have to burn down a few bridges with Denmark to take Greenland ... we’re big boys ... we dropped A-bombs on Japan and now they are our ally… America is not handcuffed by history."

Addition: Here is an alternative link to Mastodon if you don't want to click Xitter: https://eupolicy.social/@Squig/114245727346349844

path: 0 16106791, hotness: undefined, score: 22, children: 0
Anyone 21 points 2 years ago

I feel somehow this 'news' is more an opener to promote the petition at the end of the article than anything else. Not that I oppose a new tax regime for the ultra-rich individuals, but there is no sophisticated content here imho.

path: 0 15468545, hotness: undefined, score: 21, children: 1
Anyone 18 points 2 years ago path: 0 15827802, hotness: undefined, score: 18, children: 0
Anyone 17 points 2 years ago path: 0 14799524 14799546, hotness: undefined, score: 17, children: 1
Anyone 13 points 2 years ago path: 0 14799317 14799541, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 1
Anyone 12 points 2 years ago

Vance's cousin fought in Ukraine, and he is openly criticizing the VP and the U.S. administration for its Ukraine stance. This is highly relevant for Ukraine and Europe.

path: 0 15586483 15587011 15587890 15588094, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 0
Anyone 12 points 2 years ago path: 0 15866372 15867901, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 1
Anyone 11 points 2 years ago

Meanwhile, as Russian attacks on Ukraine killed dozens over the weekend and destroyed Ukrainian energy infrastructure after the U.S. pulled much of its support from Kyiv, Trump defended Putin’s ramped-up attacks on Friday, as per Democracy Now:

President Donald Trump: “I actually think he [Putin] is doing what anybody else would do. I think he’s — I think he wants to get it stopped and settled, and I think he’s hitting them harder than — than he’s been hitting them. And I think probably anybody in that position would be doing that right now.

path: 0 15587403, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 1
Anyone 11 points 2 years ago path: 0 14919200 14919324 14919408 14919546, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 2
Anyone 9 points 2 years ago

It makes an interesting read.

... Tesla’s record in China shows how Musk has thrived in a system in which regulators, the media and the courts — which must all ultimately answer to the ruling Communist Party — are, by design, somewhat intertwined ...

Tesla has profited from the largesse of the Chinese state, winning unprecedented regulatory benefits, below-market rate loans and large tax breaks. With a few pointed exceptions, Tesla has enjoyed largely ingratiating coverage in the Chinese press, and journalists told AP they have been instructed to avoid negative coverage of the automaker.

Tesla’s windfall has extended to the courts — and not just in legal actions Tesla has brought against customers. In a review of public court documents, AP found that Tesla won nearly 90% of civil cases over safety, quality or contract disputes brought by customers.

“The government gave Tesla a super status that put consumers in a very vulnerable position,” said Qiao Yudong, a former lawyer for American sports car company Saleen Automotive in China. “That’s why some consumers had to resort to extreme actions.”

One of those desperate customers was Zhang.

[...]

Two Chinese journalists based in Shanghai told AP there is an unwritten rule to avoid critical coverage of Tesla. Both spoke on condition of anonymity, fearing retaliation.

“We were told by our editor that we should not write negatively about Tesla because it is a key company that was introduced and protected by the Shanghai government,” a tech reporter told AP.

Those who have strayed have found themselves in court. Musk’s company sued media outlets PingWest and ifeng.com over negative coverage. It was unhappy about PingWest’s report that claimed Tesla’s Shanghai factory was a “sweatshop.” The news website ifeng.com drew Tesla’s ire over a story that explored the tribulations of car owners who fought Tesla. PingWest had to apologize and pay Tesla 100,000 yuan ($13,700). AP could not determine the outcome of the case against ifeng.com.

Tesla is not the only company in its industry to sue its critics. BYD has also aggressively pursued media in court, including an unsuccessful lawsuit against Vice Media in the United States. More recently, electric vehicle makers Nio and Li Auto have stepped up defamation cases against bloggers in China who allegedly spread false information about their companies.

[...]

“Tesla used their legal advantages to bully Chinese car owners and people who speak up for them,” said Feng Shiming, an auto blogger and Tesla owner who was ordered by a Shanghai court last year to pay Tesla 250,000 yuan ($34,200) after he wrote about Tesla’s alleged brake failures. He has appealed the verdict. “Tesla wants to have a chilling effect on society and terrify people so they will be scared to say anything negative about Tesla.”

path: 0 15044300, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 0
Anyone 8 points 2 years ago

Might not be a bad idea to collaborate with China ...

This is exactly the point. Renewables are the future, but Europe must not replace its dependence on Russian oil with dependence on Chinese tech. Given that China is a decisive supporter of Russia's war in Ukraine (and falsely claims that former Sovie-republics like Ukraine, the Baltic states, and others have no independent legal status), it is clear that Beijing is not exactly a friend of Europe to say the least.

It is absolutely necessary for the EU to (re-)build its wind and solar sector.

path: 0 16316166 16316353, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
Anyone 7 points 2 years ago

Donald should not mess up with Denmark. They may not have the cards, but they have the eggs. Think of the eggs ...

path: 0 15687610, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
Anyone 7 points 2 years ago

... China’s policy of heavily subsidizing key industries, which allows Chinese manufacturers to produce at a scale and cost that Western companies struggle to match.

Yes, but it's not just the subsidies. An additional important factor in this context that the article doesn't mention is the number of people in China who are forced into modern slavery. Therefore, a strong supply chain law is essential not only with regards to human rights (any trade agreement that does not include this crucial issue is useless imo), but also for a competition policy.

The article makes several good points how Germany and Europe have an advantage over China. But we need to get the human rights issue, too. That's a major point.

path: 0 15799315, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
Anyone 6 points 2 years ago

Friendly reminder that the European Parliament lifted restrictions on MEPs, allowing them to meet Chinese officials again (the restrictions were introduced two years ago over human rights abuses in East Turkistan, a region which is referred to as Xinjiang by the Chinese regime). Maybe it's time to correct this?

path: 0 15688612, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 1
Anyone 6 points 2 years ago

I agree. Unfortunately there is a lot of this bs here in this community, and it appears to come form always the same accounts.

path: 0 16184482 16184865, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 1
Anyone 6 points 2 years ago

Here is a much better way for Europe's tech firms to catch up in global AI race (spoiler: a multilingual, fully open source, law-compliant, democratic and homegrown LLM): https://slrpnk.net/post/17978607

path: 0 14881612, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0

thanks for using Leebra!

go to feed...