Actually you will probably die in a Tesla whose doors do not open https://www.msn.com/...

Or which just hits you: https://www.washingtonpost.com/...

I mean now where Teslas are probably the next mandatory car for state officials. And after some "Think Tank" will be pretty sure that all the saftey fuss about autopilots is bad for the economy.

You are also dying in the future. So no treatment for you. It's even cheaper the sooner you die. And since you don't need money after you've died, lets make your last days so expensive that we can extract all the money from you and if possible from the rest of your family. Profit.

This is just stolen from a Terry Prachett Novel.

From his resume:

Goals I am looking to be part of a small-to-midsized engineering team where I can have real impact by solving hard and previously unsolvable problems by leveraging AI tools.

I would also not hire him. I'm not really familiar with US resume culture, but the whole thing is very unappealing to me. Also from his linked substack, I get unpleasant vibes.

• pulls out a smaller $50 bill

I find this somehow funnier.

We all have hundreds of contacts

What? Really? Can't relate.

To show they were not AI generated. At that time AI usually got the number of fingers wrong. 😉

Probably the one with more brain cells. That must be right, mustn't it?

Why did the CPU die?

Verstehe den Wunsch nach neuer GraKa. Die alte rendert die Texturen auf dem Fahrrad wirklich nicht gut.

And he still does not know the difference between taxes and tariffs and who's gonna pay them.

What a looser! If they would shave each others head during a meeting this would be much more productive. But the big question is: who hired all the hairy people in the first place?

Ah. Good. Now we can calculate the optimal amount of ketchup to pour over them. I also like them uncooked on pineapple pizza. Yummy.

The socks on the grass lead me to believe that this was not a spontaneous course of events. 😀

Genau. Sofern nicht anderweitig geschützt. Das ist das Problem, nicht die fortlaufende ID. Persönliche Daten hinter einer zufälligen ID zu verstecken statt hinter einem Zugriffsschutz ist "security by obscurity". Man kann immer noch mit Brute-Force die Daten bekommen. Der Zugriff ist immer noch möglich, nur dauert er eventuell länger.

Richtig wäre es gewesen jedem Link eine eindeutige Kennung zuzuordnen, die nur Zugriff auf die relevanten IDs hat.

Dieser Spinn "oh, ein Fehler, die IDs waren fortlaufend, passiert schon mal" verdeckt die beiden tatsächlichen Probleme:

• Zugriff auf persönliche Daten ohne Authentifizierung
• Unzulässige Erhebung von personenbezogenen Daten

As a non blind person I really appreciate these alt texts/image descriptions.

The thing is it is highly doubtful that Pavlov ever used a bell. Also the experiments were no fun for the dogs.

He redirected the animals' digestive fluids outside the body, where they could be measured.

https://en.wikipedia.org/...

https://www.todayifoundout.com/...

Much more fun: I worked as a freelancer, job needed to be publicly tendered for again after a while. Customers department was very satisfied and really wanted to keep me in the project. Turned out that I was not qualified for the job according to the job description their purchasing department published. I find that hilariously funny.

A study found AI is slowing experienced developers down: https://www.reuters.com/...