I'm not an expert, but I think this is fairly typical. Unless any of that wood is actively rotting (which would indicate a larger moisture issue that needs to be addressed), using old ugly boards to stabilize and level cabinets and countertops would seem to me like the appropriate approach during installation.

It looks like this was a remodel? If so, they definitely wouldn't have bothered to make anything look pretty if it's going to be hidden behind cabinets.

In other words - it's probably not as bad as it looks. If it ain't broke, don't fix it.

Anyone who didn't think Iran was about to start experiencing extremely high numbers of civilian casualties hasn't been paying attention to what's been going on in Palestine.

"No no, but what if the guy is just, like, at the table because he's Nazi- curious but kind totally didn't kill anybody and probably wouldn't but also the Nazis make good points about stuff so he can totally sit there, but he's not a Nazi! See? There are exceptions!"

-that guy, probably

I agree with this, but also want to point out that gas stations are a poor substitute for a corner grocer or bodega. They are simply too large and require too much land for the function they are serving. Zoning rightfully mandates that they can't be on the bottom floor of a larger building due to the dangers posed by gasoline and they require lots of space for cars to park.

Essentially, we have forfeited a lot of valuable space to dispensing gasoline and significantly diminished the best features of corner stores by making them serve both functions. I would be curious to see what would happen if gas stations were forbidden from serving anything other than gas in high density areas. I would assume there would be much fewer of them, and each one would be optimized for efficiency to take up as little space as possible. We would also likely see the reemergence of neighborhood bodegas and corner grocers to fill the gap.

DJIU DJIU DJIU DJIU DJIU DJIU DJIU DJIU DJIU DJIU DJIU DJIU DJIU

Because there's probably a significant number of affected rich folks who are retirees, vets, or both. Though, the propane you saw insinuates that it's the other way around - that a significant number of retirees and vets would be targeted by the new law. It's a pretty common tactic used against dumb people who can't tell the difference. Good on you for seeing through it.

I always make sure my logs are covered by Spunk.

It is if you're targeting edgelord maga folks

Sex

The comment directly below this one reads like propaganda straight from Moscow. I'm very glad to see it down-voted. Blaming blatant authoritarianism and extremely dangerous rhetoric on "old people" seems like a pretty obvious diversion from the actual culprits: the entire Republican party who is sleepwalking into a legit second coup attempt. They're losing political power and have abandoned the idea of democracy. The fact that they're unable or unwilling to drown this Nazi rhetoric in the bathtub speaks volumes. They are openly supporting authoritarianism. Not "old people". Republicans.

I'm only guessing, but it's possible they're fed lies about surrender. If he's convinced that being captured will result in death by torture or starvation (something I'm pretty sure the Russians have been doing to their POW’s), pulling a grenade on your captors might actually seem like a reasonable decision.

I feel bad for the Russian men who men - victims of their own government's propaganda. Enlisting in a bullshit war only to become fertilizer and coyote food in Ukrainian fields. I still enjoy watching them get their asses kicked though.

We have to acknowledge that Republicans have lots to offer if you're a mega corp.

1. They pick up the phone for you and your lobbyists - day or night
2. They lower your tax burden
3. They functionally killed unionization - allowing you to pay your executives enormous sums of money while the majority of your workforce struggles financially.
4. If you're somehow unable to outright buy their legislative agenda with bribes campaign donations, they can instead be forced to comply with subtle threats to leak details of their various homosexual escapades to the media.
5. They tend to have absolutely no morals - which is great for your shareholders.

It's different because you seem to be saying "workers should be able to be incredibly vulnerable to the whims of employers because employers should be good people". The other guy's response to that is "why would we ever assume employers are going to be good to their employees absent any mechanism to enforce said good behavior?"

Please, please do this in Pennsylvania. As a "swing state" (Jesus fuck the electoral college has really fucked us) he needs to be removed. Here in Illinois, he's not going to win here anyway.

"These jackasses over here seem to want to live their lives happier, healthier, and carefree like some utopia or something. Dummies, amirite?"

Out of curiosity and slight discomfort, what is that black object in the top left corner?

Yes, I think that's the reasonable argument Google's lawyers and PR will use - but your example kind of demonstrates why that argument falls flat. The service DHL is providing to Amazon is logistics and shipping. This is an established, well-regulated industry all its own.

Meanwhile, at Google, this contractor's services are listed in the article:

ensuring music content is available and approved for YouTube Music’s 80 million subscribers worldwide

That sounds an awful lot like running the service to me. These employees perform key YouTube-specific work on an ongoing basis. For all intents and purposes, they work for Google, in Google's offices, on Google's systems, but their paycheck comes from Cognizant. The services being rendered aren't on the level of "you make the widget and we'll transport it to stores around the country because we're a shipping company". This is more like "we employ people for you, but provide a flimsy air gap so you don't have to treat them like actual employees. We sell legally plausible deniability as a service."

Sex. I want my company to pay me to sex. I feel like I could totally get behind that. Sexually.

Looks like the superintendent is all about following the rules to a T - that is unless it's his kid - in which case he'll gladly obstruct an investigation a likely DUI.

https://www.chron.com/...

Dot Hogs