0
88
Bluedragon012

@lemmy.world

Bluedragon012 10 points 5 days ago

Kill the rich, save the poor. Taxation, is not enough for the current era. There must be justice for the crimes committed. Once they are dead, then we can figure out how to run the world without capitalism. Untill then, the elimination of the ultra-rich by any means should be the goal. Everything else is noise.

In addition: We have the power. The US power grid is fragile. As such if we all turn off our power at the exact same time, we can cripple the grid. On July 4th at 11pm cst exactly, we can all power down our homes. Even if only 50% do it, it will enough. We have the power, and we will stop these monsters by any means necessary!

path: 0 24307519, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 2
Bluedragon012 4 points 4 days ago

You raise fair points. Will reconsider.

path: 0 24307531 24308369 24319512 24319970 24321236, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
Bluedragon012 3 points 4 days ago

Update, others have raised good points on why this will not work. I value thier input.

path: 0 24307531 24308369 24319512 24321300, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
Bluedragon012 7 points 5 days ago

Kill the rich, save the poor. Taxation, is not enough for the current era. There must be justice for the crimes committed. Once they are dead, then we can figure out how to run the world without capitalism. Untill then, the elimination of the ultra-rich by any means should be the goal. Everything else is noise.

In addition: We have the power. The US power grid is fragile. As such if we all turn off our power at the exact same time, we can cripple the grid. On July 4th at 11pm cst exactly, we can all power down our homes. Even if only 50% do it, it will enough. We have the power, and we will stop these monsters by any means necessary!

path: 0 24307531, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 16
Bluedragon012 3 points 5 days ago

I will admit, it's like talking about two different things but look at my replies to others and it'll make abit more sense. I'll try to find a more eloquent way to show how it's connected.

path: 0 24307531 24307575 24319500, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
Bluedragon012 3 points 5 days ago

Sure thing. I can explain: copied from another reply: If all Americans were to cut thier power at the same exact time (or as close to same time as possible,) the power grid would not be able to handle it. How is it different than a power outage? In an outage powrr fails to route to where power is wanted. Even in these sanarios if too much power is shunted to a spot due to power trying find a spot to go, it pops transformers or other power grid equipment. Now imagine it on a mass scale. A Simi dosent stop just because it ran out of road. Why this would work: In the past there were efforts to turn off the lights at an exact time for eco reasons. Like : "lights off at 10pm to save energy!" they were told that it is OK to do this BUT they had to turn off lights and power GRADUALLY because of the effect I said above. Thus, if we all power off our homes, or all our lights at the same time, we could damage the grid.

Why did I include this in post? we need a bargaining chip. We need a credible real threat to fight back.

It's hard to get people to go outside with a gun. it's hard to get people to outside and hunt down the ultra rich. It's even hard for people to protest because they don't have time to do it because they must survive.

But it is easy to get everyone to turn off a light. Even the ones who don't touch grass can turn off a light switch. If they can like a post, they can flip a switch. It's even easy to get the "non-political" people to go along with this because we can just tell them it's an eco effort or something.

Risk factors: If Americans actually do it: it will knock out power for several months. (up side it forces all of us to replace equipment that probobly needed to be) if it succeededs. If the us government and energy companies counter by preping for the sudden stop, the meters will still be running thus giving a physical way to measure how many people are protesting. So even if the "attack" fails, the power companies can see how pissed we are and thus report it to the local government which then reports to federal. So even if it "fails" the fact that we're willing to try shows how upset we Americans are in a way they cannot ignore. It shows we are looking for ways to take our power back by force.

But I say if they want us to go back in time why not go even further?

But what of the innocent that need power to survive? 2 responses: 1. Should of thought about that before becoming a facisit nation. 2. The current regime said "empathy is weakness." just following the example set by our "great" leaders.

How are the "kill the rich" statement and this are connected: When there is no power, there are no cameras. Cameras powered by solar can be removed. No cameras means no ability to track crimes. Now we can use techniques that are more overt, like raiding the ultra-riches home. Why not just attack thier homes directly? No power means no cell signal, no way to track people before they get there. Historical context; if we had cameras back in the civil rights movement back country cops and kkk members would had more trouble Lynching people they didn't like. The reverse is also true. No witnesses, no crime.

But more importantly: it's a mutually assured distruction tactic, they can't rule over something that is destroyed and in chaos. And like I said, we will stop this regime BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY.

Why the date and time: we need to do this before power companies spend most of the generator budget on Ai centers. right now it mostly serves homes and businesses, if we break the current equipment power companies will have to choose between serving the population or serving the Ai overlords. Power companies hire the most working class of working class to do thier work, so .. Might be hard to convince them to serve the Ai overlord over thier families.

I think this gets it all.. If not I will explain further.

path: 0 24307531 24308104 24319482, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
Bluedragon012 2 points 5 days ago

Sure thing. If all Americans were to cut thier power at the same exact time (or as close to same time as possible,) the power grid would not be able to handle it. How is it different than a power outage? In an outage powrr fails to route to where power is wanted. Even in these sanarios if too much power is shunted to a spot due to power trying find a spot to go, it pops transformers or other power grid equipment. Now imagine it on a mass scale. A Simi dosent stop just because it ran out of road. Why this would work: In the past there were efforts to turn off the lights at an exact time for eco reasons. Like : "lights off at 10pm to save energy!" they were told that it is OK to do this BUT they had to turn off lights and power GRADUALLY because of the effect I said above. Thus, if we all power off our homes, or all our lights at the same time, we could damage the grid.

Why did I include this in post? we need a bargaining chip. We need a credible real threat to fight back.

It's hard to get people to go outside with a gun. it's hard to get people to outside and hunt down the ultra rich. It's even hard for people to protest because they don't have time to do it because they must survive.

But it is easy to get everyone to turn off a light. Even the ones who don't touch grass can turn off a light switch. If they can like a post, they can flip a switch. It's even easy to get the "non-political" people to go along with this because we can just tell them it's an eco effort or something.

Risk factors: If Americans actually do it: it will knock out power for several months. (up side it forces all of us to replace equipment that probobly needed to be) if it succeededs. If the us government and energy companies counter by preping for the sudden stop, the meters will still be running thus giving a physical way to measure how many people are protesting. So even if the "attack" fails, the power companies can see how pissed we are and thus report it to the local government which then reports to federal. So even if it "fails" the fact that we're willing to try shows how upset we Americans are in a way they cannot ignore. It shows we are looking for ways to take our power back by force.

But I say if they want us to go back in time why not go even further?

But what of the innocent that need power to survive? 2 responses: 1. Should of thought about that before becoming a facisit nation. 2. The current regime said "empathy is weakness." just following the example set by our "great" leaders.

How are the "kill the rich" statement and this are connected: When there is no power, there are no cameras. Cameras powered by solar can be removed. No cameras means no ability to track crimes. Now we can use techniques that are more overt, like raiding the ultra-riches home. Why not just attack thier homes directly? No power means no cell signal, no way to track people before they get there. Historical context; if we had cameras back in the civil rights movement back country cops and kkk members would had more trouble Lynching people they didn't like. The reverse is also true. No witnesses, no crime.

But more importantly: it's a mutually assured distruction tactic, they can't rule over something that is destroyed and in chaos. And like I said, we will stop this regime BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY.

Why the date and time: we need to do this before power companies spend most of the generator budget on Ai centers. right now it mostly serves homes and businesses, if we break the current equipment power companies will have to choose between serving the population or serving the Ai overlords. Power companies hire the most working class of working class to do thier work, so .. Might be hard to convince them to serve the Ai overlord over thier families.

I think this gets it all.. If not I will explain further.

path: 0 24307531 24308547 24319471, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
Bluedragon012 7 points 7 days ago

Can confirm, am one of those.. It's been too long and I don't know if it's worth fighting back.

path: 0 24284936 24285499, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
Bluedragon012 1 point 4 days ago

Update, the power grid idea is a bust. Thankyou all for your input.

path: 0 24307531 24321328, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Bluedragon012 1 point 4 days ago

Update, others have raised fair points. Keep up the good work.

path: 0 24307531 24308104 24319482 24321319, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Bluedragon012 1 point 4 days ago

Update, others have raised fair points. Keep on fighting you all.

path: 0 24307531 24307575 24319500 24321312, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Bluedragon012 1 point 5 days ago

Thankyou for the proper time cordnation.

path: 0 24307519 24311740 24318648, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Bluedragon012 2 points 7 days ago

Bruh, that is just an ancient sewing tool. It's been proven. Chill.

path: 0 24272959 24273827 24274557 24275037 24284775 24285058 24285153, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 2
Bluedragon012 0 points 5 days ago

To elloborate: If all Americans were to cut thier power at the same exact time (or as close to same time as possible,) the power grid would not be able to handle it. How is it different than a power outage? In an outage powrr fails to route to where power is wanted. Even in these sanarios if too much power is shunted to a spot due to power trying find a spot to go, it pops transformers or other power grid equipment. Now imagine it on a mass scale. A Simi dosent stop just because it ran out of road. Why this would work: In the past there were efforts to turn off the lights at an exact time for eco reasons. Like : "lights off at 10pm to save energy!" they were told that it is OK to do this BUT they had to turn off lights and power GRADUALLY because of the effect I said above. Thus, if we all power off our homes, or all our lights at the same time, we could damage the grid.

Why did I include this in post? we need a bargaining chip. We need a credible real threat to fight back.

It's hard to get people to go outside with a gun. it's hard to get people to outside and hunt down the ultra rich. It's even hard for people to protest because they don't have time to do it because they must survive.

But it is easy to get everyone to turn off a light. Even the ones who don't touch grass can turn off a light switch. If they can like a post, they can flip a switch. It's even easy to get the "non-political" people to go along with this because we can just tell them it's an eco effort or something.

Risk factors: If Americans actually do it: it will knock out power for several months. (up side it forces all of us to replace equipment that probobly needed to be) if it succeededs. If the us government and energy companies counter by preping for the sudden stop, the meters will still be running thus giving a physical way to measure how many people are protesting. So even if the "attack" fails, the power companies can see how pissed we are and thus report it to the local government which then reports to federal. So even if it "fails" the fact that we're willing to try shows how upset we Americans are in a way they cannot ignore. It shows we are looking for ways to take our power back by force.

But I say if they want us to go back in time why not go even further?

But what of the innocent that need power to survive? 2 responses: 1. Should of thought about that before becoming a facisit nation. 2. The current regime said "empathy is weakness." just following the example set by our "great" leaders.

How are the "kill the rich" statement and this are connected: When there is no power, there are no cameras. Cameras powered by solar can be removed. No cameras means no ability to track crimes. Now we can use techniques that are more overt, like raiding the ultra-riches home. Why not just attack thier homes directly? No power means no cell signal, no way to track people before they get there. Historical context; if we had cameras back in the civil rights movement back country cops and kkk members would had more trouble Lynching people they didn't like. The reverse is also true. No witnesses, no crime.

But more importantly: it's a mutually assured distruction tactic, they can't rule over something that is destroyed and in chaos. And like I said, we will stop this regime BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY.

Why the date and time: we need to do this before power companies spend most of the generator budget on Ai centers. right now it mostly serves homes and businesses, if we break the current equipment power companies will have to choose between serving the population or serving the Ai overlords. Power companies hire the most working class of working class to do thier work, so .. Might be hard to convince them to serve the Ai overlord over thier families.

I think this gets it all.. If not I will explain further.

path: 0 24307531 24308369 24319512, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 3
Bluedragon012 1 point 7 days ago

So all we got to say is: ("Mr. Trump your the bestist big great leader of da world! Unmatched! And you know what the best leaders in the world do right?... That's right they take this little pill. It'll make your dick the biggest, your skin the fairest, and it'll give you the hutzpah to take down your enimes with you big fists!" Trump proceeds in taking the cyanide pill and the hell will be over.) And here I thought we needed to be aggressive to kill the facisits. Nah aprently we just got to treat him like a kid.

path: 0 24285379, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Bluedragon012 45 points a month ago

He is a little young to be doing weed, needs a conversation about its effects on younger minds. As for porn, time for proper sex Ed. no punishment needed, more education needed.

(to be clear the weed take is imo, not fact, do what's best for you)

path: 0 23629509, hotness: undefined, score: 45, children: 8
Bluedragon012 30 points 9 days ago

Kill the rich, save the poor. Taxation, is not enough for the current era. There must be justice for the crimes committed. Once they are dead, then we can figure out how to run the world without capitalism. Untill then, the elimination of the ultra-rich by any means should be the goal. Everything else is noise.

path: 0 24240288, hotness: undefined, score: 30, children: 15
Bluedragon012 27 points 2 months ago

To quote Malcom X: "It's the ballot, or the bullet."

We gonna have to get mean of we want it to change. Looking at the comments, we are already there.

path: 0 23270427, hotness: undefined, score: 27, children: 3
Bluedragon012 23 points a month ago

Irs: "How about we do it anyway? Seems to work for you."

path: 0 23836782, hotness: undefined, score: 23, children: 0
Bluedragon012 22 points 2 months ago

Hmmm.. No taxation without representation. So.. What we dumping into a body of water?

path: 0 23469109, hotness: undefined, score: 22, children: 2

thanks for using Leebra!

go to feed...