38,4°C for non americans.
@lemmy.world
This just makes sense. They most likely did a repair or something underneath the bricks. To do this they took them all out and put them in a big pile, did the work and then started to put them back.
Now are you going to just put the bricks back quick and efficiently since all the bricks are the same, or are you going to inspect nearly every single brick with a line to ensure you are placing the correct brick in place?
I know what I would do.
Not the one you asked. I don't have any statistics, but from what I've seen of YouTubers living or visiting Japan is an obscene amount of plastic on the food wrapping/packaging. You open a cardboard box and then there's a plastic bag inside with small individual portions wrapped in plastic for instance.
I'd just have a ruler placed next to the profile, taken a picture and traced it in CAD. If something is, lets say 64,5 mm in my initial trace I can safely assume that the dimension is supposed to be 65 mm. When you feel like you're done, make a test and then maybe iterate.
Also agree that whatever approach you think is the easiest may be the easiest approach.
I think a SNES controller is way too reliable. Should be an Apple mouse that definitely wont be needing to be charged at the worst time possible.
I think they will also need to fire way more engineers who tell them the way they do things are too dangerous.
Just searched a bit, looking into how the length came to be and found this from wikipedia. https://simple.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_length "The Planck length does not have any precise physical significance, and it is a common misconception that it is the inherent pixel size of the universe." What I found elsewhere was that it's the only length one can get out of the universal constans of G, c and h. So as far as I know with my limited know how is that the planck length is useful or more convenient than other lengths in quantum physics.
thanks for using Leebra!
go to feed...