27
61
DragonWasabi

@monyet.cc

DragonWasabi 17 points 3 years ago

Is it actually water?

path: 0 2813508 2814255, hotness: undefined, score: 17, children: 9
DragonWasabi 7 points 2 years ago

The app is also literally called Little Red Book as an alternative name

path: 0 14557391, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 1
DragonWasabi 6 points 3 years ago

They have a twisted relationship with ducks

path: 0 5859030 5860330, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 1
DragonWasabi 5 points 3 years ago

Honestly wondering why people do this (why people immediately assume you must be part of any group you're defending). And I didn't think I answered that, but maybe I did and I missed it

path: 0 5884940 5885130, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 1
DragonWasabi 4 points 8 months ago

path: 0 22022216, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
DragonWasabi 4 points 2 years ago

They legally had that right at the time. I don't think they should have had that right, or that they morally have that right. I think we're talking about 2 different meanings of the term "right". In one sense (legally), they had the right, as in it was codified into law. That's not a belief as much as a fact. The part which concerns my belief is whether I think they should have had the right or if they have the moral right, which I don't. I hope that makes sense.

path: 0 10136408 10136975 10137049 10137166 10137227 10137282, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 3
DragonWasabi 4 points 2 years ago

Legal rights vs moral rights, that's the confusion.

path: 0 10136408 10136975 10137049 10137166 10137227 10137301, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
DragonWasabi 3 points 2 years ago

Do you agree that someone can theoretically have a legal right to do something bad (as in, be legally allowed to do it) without that being a good or moral right for them to have?

I think you're only believing "right" to mean one thing and one thing only, when I'm using it in a sense where legality and morality don't necessarily coincide (even if they do in other contexts, conditionally).

So when I say they had the legal right to own slaves, and that right was taken away from them, that isn't a matter of opinion/belief because that's factually what happened, but that doesn't mean that I think they had the right morally speaking, which is a different concept.

I hope this makes sense.

path: 0 10136408 10136975 10137049 10137166 10137227 10137282 10137771 10137845, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
DragonWasabi 3 points 3 years ago

I tend to agree, but what about making a child do chores in a family household? Most children don't want to do it and some don't get anything in return, the tasks can sometimes be grueling. Would that always be unethical, or only when taken to an excessive degree that severely impacts the child?

path: 0 2981134 2981292, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 9
DragonWasabi 2 points 2 years ago

But does no one really care? I think at least someone might.

path: 0 14474306 14474338, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 10
DragonWasabi 2 points 2 years ago

Yes, I think so. Lay it to rest and stop f***ing with it, finally.

path: 0 10410838 10452505, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
DragonWasabi 2 points 2 years ago

Yeah, "who asked?" is the other one. Also doesn't seem literal, because does someone really need to ask you about something in order for you to offer your opinion on it? Is this one of those weird, oppressive, "you shall only speak when spoken to" situations, arguably harkening back to multiple forms of historical discrimination/oppression & attempts to silence people or restrict freedom of speech/dissenting thought (not consciously, I'm almost positive)?. Seems like a thought-terminating cliche, basically meaningless, just a method of shutting anyone down without having to provide any justified reason. Also could be bullying depending on how it's used. But yeah, mostly it's just nonsense. I appreciate your comments & advice.

path: 0 14476776 14479391, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
DragonWasabi 2 points 2 years ago

I suffer from social anxiety, but I'm unsure how you inferred that based on my post or my writing style (I also have incoherent thoughts sometimes, so it may just be coincidental). Not offended at all btw, I only mildly care (lol). Just curious. And I appreciate your comment.

path: 0 14476691 14479535, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
DragonWasabi 2 points 3 years ago

Thanks. Recognised as a medical issue but not as a disability, is what I meant. Certain medical issues aren't considered disabilities as far as I know, even though they can affect a person's ability to do things. Or are you saying that all medical conditions are disabilities? Apologies if I was mistaken

Also I'm just wondering, isn't it possible the DSM could be behind in recognising certain conditions? It may be widely recognised, but just not necessarily by the DSM. I get that you might not call it a disability then but perhaps still a health issue? I'm not sure

path: 0 5771522 5771680, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 5
DragonWasabi 1 point 3 years ago

I'm not sure if this is what you're looking for but I use releases.com to track upcoming shows/movies and get alerted to when they're coming out, and I use the same site as a watchlist even though it's not specifically made for that (I think)

path: 0 2912331, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
DragonWasabi 1 point 3 years ago
path: 0 4634509 4640256 4641345, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
DragonWasabi 1 point 3 years ago
path: 0 4634715 4639184 4641405, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
DragonWasabi 1 point 3 years ago

Go to ElwoodDogMeat.com ! Yes!

path: 0 2439296, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
DragonWasabi 1 point 3 years ago

Everyone wants me to watch The Bear. I just can't bring myself to care about it. A guy who makes sandwiches? I'll watch it if someone can convince me to or give me a reason lol

path: 0 2763451 2912295, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
DragonWasabi 1 point 3 years ago

Thanks, I do believe that they're fine with whatever pronouns I call them by, this was more of a me problem about not knowing what to actually call them in that case lol. Like paradox of choice kind of, except I also wonder about what my choice might indicate to them and whether I should randomise it or base it on something.

path: 0 3532203 3535612, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0

thanks for using Leebra!

go to feed...