You can tell he's no threat to the establishment by how the establishment treats him. If he were a threat, we wouldn't be hearing this 'king of the north' stuff.

That's fair. I'm much happier voting for Greens, less hand wringing, more sleep, that sort of thing. I couldn't imaging having the support of genocide on my conscience, I support it via taxes... But voting for it? Then theres the anti-privacy, the anti-LGBT, the Mandleson thing...

I can't remember the moment I chose not to vote labour, it could have been when he told people to leave. I do remember, very specifically, not wanting to support Starmer though, a good call I think. There's a reason Starmer got fewer votes than Corbyn: we knew.

Gosh, when I smoked, I punctuated my life with cigarettes. Get dressed, smoke. Coffee, smoke. Do the pots, smoke. Start laundry, smoke. Finish laundry, smoke. Vacuum, smoke. Shave, smoke....

I stopped smoking a decade ago, but I've recently got into rum in a properly way. Which I think might be worse.

Steven Hartley has a Lemmy account? Jack Denny maybe?

Also, 1500 years ago, destroyed every transpohbe's "define a woman" nonesense.

Cyberpunk launch: buggy as fuck.

Witcher 3 launch: buggy as fuck.

Idk about other cdpr games. You should wait for reviews regardless of publisher, but particularly CDPR, for whom you should wait for the GoTY edition.

It could be the Guardian manufacturing consent for Burnham. Or, they could be talking with Labour MPs off the record. Sure, Starmer hasn't announced anything, but anyone who know, KNOWS.

I don't really know where I land on The Guardian, they're mostly factual so probably the latter. Do they have a wealthy owner, for whom Burnham is particularly advantagous, to justify manufacturing the consent?

He announced his resignation, it was probably the latter

A hosting service for games. Feed it games and it allows you to download them from your server, manage saves, emulate in browser... A bunch of stuff. It's a good project.

Yes the roof fell off in this case, but I don't want anyone thinking that Moscow isn't safe.

I learned long ago whether someone told me they were pan or bi, it took absolutely zero effort on my part to accept and agree with them.

Sure you're bi/pan, but are you a unicorn, because my fiancée and I really like your vibe.

I didn't think the /s was necessary... I thought the "we like your vibe" was cliche unicorn hunter speak. I even used the word 'unicorn'.

Anyways I fully agree, hence how I framed it. I fully apologise if I came off as anything other than tongue in cheek.

Ah well, allow me to subvert that suggestion.

Expressly and unequivocally, threesomes are not something I particularly talk about when talking to bi/pan people.

Certainly not any more than anyone else. It isn't something I voluntarily suggest we do, it's not something I expressly ask about. Some of my friends have had threesomes, and some of those are bi/pan. So it's not something I've not talked about, it's just not the first thing that comes to mind.

Dopamine management system

Let me get my robe, and wizard hat real quick.

Is there a, err, nsfw instance? Asking, like, for a friend.

I don't really know how guy unicorns are targeted? Are they? I've only heard of the term unicorn being applied to women. But, I'm adjacent to the space at best.

Has cucking, becoming more fashionable, increased couples targeting bulls the same way unicorns are? As in toxically.

I suppose it's different, a unicorn is expected to attended to both partners equally. Whereas, a bull isn't really.

This is both off topic, and a Wendy's. I don't expect an answer.

Simples, when she out grows her B-shells, she wears her C-shells.