Lol, lmao even

I agree except that I suspect the only options preferable to someone basically doing the same things is so far to the left that it's not achievable.

That's not what I'm referring to.

This is far from certain but is one hypothesis. Another one is that, like armpit hair it traps scent molecules (mm mmm!) to make you smell sexy.

In any case, like the rest of the hair on our bodies, we've been styling it for millennia (my phone suggested: stroking it, which is probably also true) and probably won't suffer if we get rid of it.

One practical benefit of shaving pubic hair is immunity against pubic lice!

Weird that they're so obsessed with the labour party when Corbyn has his whole new one

I think the u-turns are symptomatic of someone who doesn't have strong personal beliefs, which fails to meet the moment. But Liz Truss had strong personal beliefs which were catastrophically wrong. Boris Johnson has strong personal beliefs in enriching his mates and throwing parties. Being a bit wishy washy and middle of the road isn't good, but it's so far from deserving of "second least popular PM ever" it's not even funny.

Someone linked the same URL today due to the release, and my instance's web UI groups posts with the same URL together... even 7 months apart!

lmao

Hopefully repeating this message will get through to a population segment that is fundamentally selfish.

Can't wait for the media to work their magic on Burnham until he too is universally reviled. It already seems to have started.

I kind of don't like them either, but they're addictive and the vibes are immaculate so here I am with a couple of hundred hours over DS1, DS3 and ER...

With respect, while that doesn't sound good, I don't think it's the kind of issue that leads to anything like "universal revulsion". It's the kind of thing that incenses politics nerds like us.

I also think "widely expected" is doing a lot of heavy lifting in your last claim.

I am not an expert so am not the person to ask.

In a way it is a child prison with extra syllables, but as I said, my guess is that the OP doesn't object in principle to a 17 year old being locked up if they commit a serious enough crime.

Is he?

Absolutely nothing. He's not been amazing by any stretch, but his net approval rating is -46, beating Liz Truss at the height of her unpopularity by a mere 1 percentage point. Liz Truss crashed the economy and the entire country knew it, while Starmer has... U-turned on a few things. Generally been a bit milquetoast. Speaks with a nasal voice?

His unpopularity is deeper than Boris Johnson, who was swilling wine with his mates while the rest of us were enjoying the delights of yet another quiz on Zoom, who illegally prorogued parliament to deliberately impede the democratic operation of parliament, ever reached.

And the same will happen to Burnham, and in two years we'll be going into another general election with the least popular PM ever and the Labour party will again be tearing itself to shreds, and hand the country over to Reform or whatever even more nakedly racist self-consciously obnoxious bile has emerged out of the right wing.

From what I've read about DS2 I would not enjoy it harder than any of the others, to the point where the other factors would cease to make up for it :P

My previous pair of walking boots I had for someone like 15 years. I cannot imagine a pair of shoes which disintegrates without being with in a few years.

Railway nationalisation needed new legislation this parliament to enact it. If we're blaming Starmer for "continuing austerity" (despite what he's done to reverse it, like lifting the two child benefit cap) and crediting the Tories for rail nationalisation, then I have to ask who's side we're on.

It's one thing when it's the media doing this kind of mud-dragging, another when it's the supposed left-wing comments section of Lemmy.

How long will you be supporting your current darling - be that Burnham or someone else, should they get into power? How long will it take you to credit all their successes to someone else, all the failures of the country and the world to them, and focus on the latter to the exclusion of all else?

The UK has young offender institutes, which are not, legally speaking, prisons. I would expect someone writing headlines to use the official terminology.

Separately I am assuming that the OP isn't perturbed by the concept of punishing children (over some threshold age, at least) for crimes, which might include this kind of punishment, but takes issue with the image conjured by the word prison (which may be wrong, and only they can say)

Categorising, difficulty turn taking in conversation, having trouble reading emotions...

Hey wait a minute!