No he provided evidence. There were people around the globe who knew about the nsa before Edward Snowden and told the truth. There were articles and videos back in 2008 about the nsa backdoor into windows. The only main difference is he, "proved it." like you know how someone goes, "yeah! well prove it!!!" He did.

My dad recently got bladder cancer fortunately they are well off enough financially that they are able to pay for treatments, thank God!

But I learned that the over 20 years of drinking was less likely to cause the bladder cancer than the fact that he smoked cigarettes. Belive it or not cigarettes have a higher risk of inducing bladder cancer whereas alcohol is more likely to destroy your liver and kidney directly.

He was also exposed to a shit load of chemicals throughout his entire life.

Cancer is a hell of a thing and I don't wish it on anyone.

There was a site a long time ago called behind the truth. There was an article from somewhere else that explained about the nsa backdoor files that are hard code installed on every windows pc. I knew back in 2008 that the nsa was spying on me.

When the Snowden thing came out I yelled BOUT TIME!!!!!!

Russia>GITMO. He did the right move going there.

It's denying the worst possible outcome of what's right in front of them to stay positive. It's a form of ignorance is bliss. Literally a boomer technique that's able to be used but to us when things are so in front of us it's hard to only give 1/10th of a fuck.

"accidentally"

Ngl, within the pharmacology thing because they keep changing shit literally every year there's never an exact treatment. Next year autism could have a level 4 or a 2 1/2 because of symptoms people notice woo-hoo treatment plans will change and then you might not be able to get the same treatment you currently have now because insurance will want you to be diagnosed with a lower level of autism and you'll be shit out of luck.

Or you could be like me who's being treated for autism with medical cannabis and you're 33 and you don't have a psychiatrist and you have really bad adhd but no one will treat you for the adhd because of the cannabis.

I mean honestly some days I wish I could fucking die because if I was being treated I would be able to focus on a lot more than I am now and I'd probably be where I want to be financially or at least feel stable in life.

Oh well, I better put on that reward system and bake some cookies and whenever I do a fuckin' good job I should just eat a fuckin' cookie kind like how I used to smoke cigarettes and whenever I did a good job I'd smoke a cigarette.

Come on we try it. It ends up in addiction or fooling ourselves. 🤦🏻‍♂️

Tmj, sciatica, shoulder pain. Muscle relaxers for the tmj sciatica is part of odd fusing and tmj is stress induced. Shoulders are just naturally fucked from being lanky.

Ibuprofen is a friend 😑

Yes, yes and of we made everyone who makes 250k/yr pay 3865$/mo for ubi income of 1800$/mo for everyone in the country it would work out. It would take like 5 years for a solid treasury/trust to accumulate. It would be able to happen though.

I want legal wording that'll make it so he has to give up half his fortune back to the world economies that he operates in.

That would be the perfect fuck you. Making legal wording at the UN (and BRICS) and making it illegal to be able to be that rich and once you get that rich you're forced to evenly redistribute half your fortune to the countries you do business in.

Ehmmmm.... Vlc?

I've always called it first glance dyslexia 🫪

You and me both. I was like that's not possible when I got banned for that. That's a valid question too. To be honest and I know filters don't think logically but thinking logically, wouldn't someone be more inclined to take their money and leave them for dead than go through the trouble of cutting off their genitals and knowing someone or having the surgical knowledge to do such?

Like castration of billionaires is way more time consuming than just finding better legal wording to get them to get them to redistribute their wealth back into society. I don't think generational wealth is as big of a problem as tax breaks are.

Think of it: they donate a building or build for example a hospital wing and that humanizes them to the public and the media and they look like less of a rat bastard while they're doing it for tax cuts and writeofffs. I bet if they also didn't need to spend money to be fiscally sound they wouldn't do it too.

If people who made 500k$ upwards got taxed by 3% more than the people who made 100k$..... Life would be significantly better.

26,978 Karma just checked my recently banned account that I've had for 5 years. I got banned for breaking rule one which is bullying, harassment or violence against a marginalized group for asking reddit something like: Why don't we castrate all billionaires if we don't want generational wealth? and all my accounts linked and I can't comment or like. ..... I missed it for a little bit for the reason of not being able to correct people as well lmfao but I don't miss it now that I've found something better.

You know what's funny with people who have the narcissistic personality disorder, is they themselves do not see anything wrong with them.

It's funny to me that you say this because thinking don't this one, humans are just anthropomorphic primates that have decided that we're the best. Humans will do anything to try to separate us and then make religion as thing and go humanity hasn't starts until this one carpenter made a cult. Try to use the whole we think where we come from are conscious and have a society we can talk have a language and look st each other differently ; SO DO ANIMALS!!!!!

I bet salmon look up at the moon and glance and wonder what it's all about but humans need to put a reason to it.

Apex predators aren't even better than anything else out there they can just eat whatever the fuck they want. Let's not forget the how many ice ages and cave people and the religion free Neanderthals and ages of time where animals bigger than the tallest building roamed in the land, sea and air.

Humans are a fucking joke even if you strip away religious things and all that humans are a fucked up species that unless it's our pets, seeing a dead animal in the street going to the zoo or hunting we don't give a fuck.

Like you know how they say eyes are the gateway to the soul well Steve Irwin knew it and he looked at other animals like an animal and respected them for what they were, that's why he was so special and it's so fucked up that anyone who can do that, who can truly have a bond with the creatures that are surrounding us, our fellow animals are the people who get called having a way with animals when it's really just connecting in the way that we are them.

So we click the things that say can not do challenge and we’ll pick the alternatives, no?

"Accessibility

For users with accessibility needs who cannot use hand gestures to complete the challenge, reCAPTCHA continues to provide visual and audio challenges, and develop more accessible and secure alternatives."

So here's what you do. You can make a screenshot reader app where it scans the qr code and reads it using a live side loaded cloud version of Google to verify it and then automatically switched back to graphene. Like your graphene security won't break but the Google system will detect your device as being under the generalized Google services and then once the scan is done the graphene system kicks back in.

Sorta like a vpn/spoofing system that relies on jailbreaking the Google api?