1
6
LeninZedong

@lemmygrad.ml

LeninZedong 23 points 3 years ago

I believe that it is somewhat useful to focus on the USSR, since they had a lot of valuable praxis and theory which a Marxist should learn, but I agree that one should expand their knowledge to other countries of actually existing socialism, and even other non-imperialist (yet not communist) countries

path: 0 562337 564365, hotness: undefined, score: 23, children: 2
LeninZedong 15 points 3 years ago

It is a simple one really: that imperialism brought civilization, technology, and relative prosperity to the natives (some youtube channel that "debunked" communism said this)

path: 0 557464, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 3
LeninZedong 4 points 3 years ago

I read the ABC of communism by Bukharin and Preobrazhensky, which is a concise explanation of socialist theory, application, Russian socio-economic conditions at the time, etc.

path: 0 538577, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
LeninZedong 2 points 3 years ago

Understandable, that is useful too

path: 0 562337 564365 615429 617852, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
LeninZedong 2 points 3 years ago

Of course! They have to create agents of capital from amongst the workers, and that means proclaiming the "benefits" of imperialism.

path: 0 557464 567110 776667, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
LeninZedong 1 point 3 years ago

National Bolshevism makes no sense to me. What exactly is it?

path: 0 557084 776722, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0

thanks for using Leebra!

go to feed...