Je vais pas me faire des amis mais l'article est à l'image de business de la cyber sécurité des 10 dernières : du slop.

Mots marketing zero trust, essayer d'expliquer comment il faudrait rate limit un accès dans l'idée, sans s'intéresser à la tache réelle qui doit être faite. Un accès est un accès il doit permettre à quelqu'un d'habileté de faire le travail quelque soit la condition, petite balle à son discours comme quoi le télétravail est anti sécurité particulièrement sloppy.

Ça veut controler encore plus mais toute action de controle implique des prises de decisions techniques qui seront d'autres portes d'entrées dans les systèmes.

Et puis le fearmongering à dire "ah oui mais doit y avoir d'autres fuites du coup", vrai, mais c'est pas le sujet.

Évidemment l'État sous Macron ne securise pas assez vu l'absence de moyen. Mais si on regarde le problème dans son mouvement

• l'Etat n'investit pas
• piratage moment x
• tout le monde en mode reac "ohlala c'est horrible"
• l'Etat dira "qui pouvait predire?" puis Macron dira qu'il va investir en sous traitant à des entreprises, mais pas trop.
• des entreprises de la cyber sécurité vont se faire du fric avec une ou deux solutions marginales au problème
• statut quo jusqu'au prochain piratage

En attendant l'Etat ne fera rien du tout pour protéger ou pour dédommager les personnes impactées. Cette critique vaut aussi pour les entreprises.

Just note how the guy starts with "only Microsoft numbers can be trusted" is biased bullshit. Pretending a company will give true numbers at all time, is a big lie. If anything they will inflate numbers and they'd try to hide the truth as much as they can because investors are watching.

While there will be truth in bots taking a part of the traffic, the whole article is Microsoft bootlicker talk.

Taking another random tool that seems to filter bot for results is just him trying to get a confirmation for his bias.

Yes a 10% stat at a given time by a given measurement tool, is not equal to a true 10% userbase. Yes there are bots. Yes there are Linux and Windows zombies alike.

Still, linux desktop is going up, with a fraction of the marketing power Windows and Apple have.

It was because of Covid, when I saw social media going into litteral foul hatred against China, despite all reasoning, that I started to think differently as a "Western" resident.

I realised all I know about China is US propaganda and hate. Facts are US helped China become strong, then they complain when China becomes a much stronger country since US put all their factories in there, all for monetary gains for their billionaires.

US will claim how they're democratic while China isn't. Placing Trump two times in power made all "democratic" arguments null, since he's going violently after people.

It still don't know China by today. Whether it's a good or bad country I can't know. The only thing I know is who is going into stupid wars and who kills hundred of thousand of people. And it's not China.

USA is the worst country to exist in this world.

"Freedom of speech" is how capitalism allowed and allows fascists into power, by using an empty moral which legitimates fascists when capitalists need them to do the dirty job.

Your points reads like "I want to see capitalist view in a community that sits against capitalism".

Maybe state your point instead ?

But look at all the billionaires they have, such glory.

Their own people are slaves with the right to vote for clowns or slavers.

But it's fine because other random country doesnt have freedom of speech (of the slaver) so they're better right ? ... Right ?

Prices going down from competitors is a capitalism lie which occurs sometimes.

That is the endgame USA is looking after. Not only Trump.

Extremes are political views that increase when the current system fails to convince enough people. In USA and Europe, extremes are growing because of the current failure of capitalism to provide people with lifes that match actual progress. As such capitalism is in its late stage, as was theorized, happening in front of our eyes to see.

Extreme right wants power for the fewest, the fittest for survival, the ones desserving the most. Extreme left wants power for everyone as equal, regardless of stature and place in society.

Not to mean that extreme left is instant heaven on earth, but it can't be said it's authoritarian.

Hmm more like USA managing to make EU increase military as wished by Trump.

News are gonna tell us "Yay EU freedom", reality is EU as a whole are still USA bootlickers on economic and culture. Those two last are what really matter, because the will of the one who holds the gun decides who this one shoots.

In a decade when Trump is out they're gonna say "oh but we were always allies, not let's use both our militaries to bomb another country because they're evil"

That'll be the story of how EU will be dupped into yet another war, that they didn't want.