One time, I've heard that a couple in the UK got an actual police visit over their FB post (WTF?!) just because a Karen complained about it. This happened after their SM "ban for kids -16" was enforced into law, what a coincidence? Nothing from their post contained anything offensive of threatening.

MSM pitch the "think of the children" agenda (whilst omitting mass surveillance) as they're either lobbied by politicians or paid by the state on pushing the narrative of "banning SM for kids -16 alleviates them being cyberbullied, exposure to violent or sexual content" with sharing sob stories trying to pinch people's heart.

I have a friend living in Australia when those laws took effect, basically nothing happened. Although there were certain websites asking for ID (however circumvented by using a paid VPN).

That reminds me of a war movie I've watched, when Josh Hartnett's character said "I think WWII has just started" during the attack on Pearl Harbor. (That line is historically inaccurate).

In reality, people would just consider it the "war" (referring to the European theater) or "Jap invasion of America" marking the US entry into the conflict (the term WWII was not coined yet until after).

There's another anachronism from that movie around 34 minutes in (during the scene where the nurses are on a transport ship heading for the hospital) as the movie is meant to be portraying 1941: you can literally see the USS Arizona memorial in the background as pictured and circled below:

It's a nitpicky detail that made it on the final cut, since that wasn't built until 1962 (way after the war!).