I'm not sure if this is a "It's called X guys" comment or a "That pile of dogshit is still online?" comment. And my upvote/downvote depends on that

I don’t know the sentiment behind your comment but my point is it’s stupid to argue about Americentrism on a Americentric platform.

Like it’s fine if you don’t want to see that content but go to a different platform rather than whine about it. It’s not the bakeries fault you arrived wanting to buy a car.

I've got some bad news for you about where the majority of fediverse users are based.

Agree on the chatbot thing but to be honest, it was like that way before LLMs.

There was a full decade where they would just keyword match you to different chat flowcharts.

Say you're alive

I am alive

omg

Versions of that meme will always amuse me

The fundamentals get worse and worse the closer you look.

Like for example, so much of their opex is filed under capex. Graphic cards & related assets degrade over time but are often listed as one time purchases, compute time is often evaluated as one time expenses but the models need to be retrained to improve over time, etc.

Woosh buy also dude has a point

A faceless banbot caught you in their word filter?

It's death for you.

I saw this on Reddit and saw everyone taking it seriously and thought "Ha, the lack reading literacy on this site is insane".

But you guys are doing the same thing.

This is a parody guys. Calm down.

Lower population is generally better for almost all sectors.

But lowering the population means killing people or restricting birthing rights.

CRAM is an utterly goated name

My claude ignores half the stuff I define in it's claud.md once it goes over ~200 lines, and I need it to know more important things like "don't try to locally verify with chromium" so it doesn't spend 20 minutes + $10 in tokens rediscovering I have removed it's permissions to accomplish that.

Personally I would assume bad design over compute vampirism. But I could be wrong.

"If you can replace a semicolon or hyphen with a comma/period, you probably should". Writing advice I received at age ~10 and it never stopped being relevant in literature contexts

It's just a series of 10 trillion floats. And we don't really know what the individual floats represent and changing them degrades performance but hey

Technically. It's just if statements.

I'm just not buying across millions of users, there exists a combination of ethical pattern matching (e.g. subs, comment patterns, online timing, etc). to reliably identify a single human behind multiple accounts. We're not that unique.

It's 100% IP and cookie based. Each of which can be circumvented without too much issue.

I have a similar story. I was banned, then "unbanned" (as in I got a notification apologizing + stating I was unbanned) but then they never actually lifted the ban

You can generally fool them by just changing one or two variables like GPU acceleration.

Or, change browsers.

The first time had enough plausible deniability that he meant it in a "See what happens" type of way.

I still think that is the most reasonable interpretation of his statements but he's intentionally playing into the media to keep the debate going. Letting people hear what they want to hear; Those that want to believe he meant the bad version (either because they like the message; or want to be mad about it) will hear that way. Those that want to believe he meant the innocent version will believe that.

It's just very sick. What a disgusting terrorist.