"I haven't watched the video but I've decided I know what it's message must be from the thumbnail, so you're wrong."
@lemmy.blahaj.zone
I mean, I haven't looked at all the data and whatnot but I imagine there are people who have millions of dollars that earned it honestly, 200 million is a lot but again I bet there are non horrible people that have that much
The reason people use 1 billion as an example is there is no good way to earn that much money, no one has ethically earned 1 billion dollars in any example I've ever seen at least, so it's a good baseline
No you're right, if you are a young actor handed the lead role of a huge franchise that could jumpstart your career and set you up for life you should DEFINITELY turn it down, after all you wouldn't want to do a poor job of it right?/s
? In the very question you linked they state without a doubt that it's depicting a fox tho
"hi, the logo is clearly depicting a fox - however the red panda (common name: firefox) is also a cute mascot for our browser"
That means they have some red panda mascots (it seems like they use to actually have some live cams that you could watch them on too!) But the logo itself does infact depict a fox
Well, I ain't no animal scientist but most fur patterns that I'm aware of exist to either make the animal blend in (by being the same color as stuff around them) or to break up their form so it's harder to recognize from a distance, and I can see how being literally cut in half color wise could help break up their shape
Again that's just a guess on my part tho
"The poll of 1,680 adults was conducted May 11-15 using a sample drawn from NORC’s probability-based AmeriSpeak Panel, which is designed to be representative of the U.S. population." (Dont know how to quote on lemmy)
That's a pretty small sample size considering, also they don't give any actual information about what kind of demographic they polled, which seems odd, but I don't know anything about AmeriSpeak so I don't know how that works
thanks for using Leebra!
go to feed...