That's not a healthy work wife relationship then. If they're jealous or hostile towards your actual spouse, that's a problem waiting to happen. They should be happy that their work partner has a good life outside work.

It clearly doesn't mention critically ill undocumented children, so that's that.

"Why a spoon, cousin?"

"Because it will hurt more!"

The problem is, if they're too old they won't be usable in any existing board. Right? Is DDR2 the baseline for this retro movement? Are there adapters, and would you even be able or want to run a much slower RAM?

Correct, except for saying everyone else is getting a living wage. I bet most of them are not. Still higher than the server.

It wasn't just him. But he threw gasoline on the fire. A lot.

Wait, so it's illegal algae? Where's ICE?

Yeah, but by then... the smell.

Wait, that's just Trump.

Noted.

That can be an effective tool, if done correctly. It sounds like you're on the right path. Use the LLM as a mirror to your own speculations and guide the discussion to the finer details. You are in a way talking to yourself much like someone would be writing in a journal, however it's more organized and faster. Just be wary of the hallucinations. I've found modifying the system prompt for replies to be short and direct unless asked to go into detail along with a short summary of your overall goals to be helpful in keeping it on track. Also regularly summarize the current session once it gets long and start a new one with the summary to avoid context wandering.

I also found Claude was better for me than Gemini and ChatGPT, but it could depend on the subject (I'm doing fiction).

One example for the detail work is something I did recently. Hammering out the technology and physics aspects of the novel's universe. We went back and forth, played with ideas, until I had a much better picture of what I want it to be like. And I had to steer Claude away a few times from diverting to other things, even with my system prompt to stay on topic. It's just what LLMs do.

At some point step away from the LLM and finish the writing yourself. It's okay to use it even for revision work, but at that point have it develop lists and suggestions for you to work with, not write the text. You'll avoid a lot of headaches later trying to "humanize" it.

I think you're right on my mistake, but I think it may be simpler. The color is green. That's why they aren't involved.

that reprehensible fuckstick Scalia openly disagrees that atheism is a valid personal belief system

He doesn't believe in zero indexing, the mad man.

You're absolutely right. For good reason, they're wonderful.

I dived in a bit, and I will concede that sexual use is not the main reason, since they evolved from primates and previous species in order to produce milk. But all other species don't have them constantly enlarged. Studies show that there are many factors at play, such as providing more area of touch for the human infant and perhaps a more constant source of food since human infants take longer to mature. But they did develop the use for sexual signalling too when we became upright, if for nothing else than for showing sexual maturity. The human brain has probably evolved along with those changes to select which characteristics evolved more pronounced.

So they have multiple uses. The very fact that they are a subconscious trigger for the male has to mean something.

Paper and skin can stop alpha particles. Glass, plastic, or a little bit of metal can stop beta. It's gamma that will get you, often because of what the gamma does through the material, knocking off new particles as it exits.

The uranium in one of these kits probably had the same potency as the radium pendants you can buy now. It's fine as long as it stays in its container and never gets inside your body.

I agree with the first. I think evolution would disagree with the second. The main purpose for partial display (aka cleavage) is enticement for attracting potential mates.

If this follows the same pattern as things like the war and other fleecing, we should see say, six to ten different attempts to fix the pool, all failing in various ways, the left blamed for it all, and someone getting tax payer money for the whole clown show.

I remember seeing that air. What a opening. Seeing how bad Wolf 359 really was from the inside. Also, I think first time we see starships turn on a dime.

Back then it was probably a lot easier to make more models, and the quality would be better with a single shot. Some of the original footage has blocky areas where the merging wasn't perfect. Didn't matter back then, it was far better than most anything else, but three model shots plus a background would have been ugly. Original Star Trek footage also has some of that.

Or to put it another way, we couldn't have faked the Moon footage because the technology to fake it wasn't created yet. It was easier to just build a big rocket and go.

It's terrorism and not punishment. About sending a message to everyone else. Drawing out the abuse gives more visibility than a single incident. And they'll turn around and say it's in accordance to a loving god. Right.