Existing userbase

You're right. In the new models they changed the rear doors. In the older models it is the same as front.

Bad design choice. Should be easier to get out in an emergency.

Vipassana meditation. There are centers all over the globe offering free 10 day courses.

A regular sleep rhythm makes all the difference. Doesn't matter when you go to bed as long as it's around the same time.

Based on? Have you seen the progress in users YouTube videos?

It's not there yet but I don't see how it can't work with vision only. It just has to be safer than human drivers.

As soon as we have hard data from real world use and FSD is safer than the average human, it would be unethical to not solve the regulatory and legal issues and apply it on a larger scale to save human lives.

If a human driver causes a crash, the insurance pays. Why shouldn't they if a computer caused the crash, which drives safer overall, if only by let's say 10%.

Human drivers use vision only

The story published by the media does a lot of harm to the greens party. It doesn't even matter if the story is corrected later on. The harm is already done.

You mean as powerful as to be able to find 3 randos willing to make 100 € per sabotaged car?

The story published by the media does a lot of harm to the greens party. It doesn't even matter if the story is corrected later on. The harm is already done.

Cheap and efficient way to influence the elections.

Should be fine if the car reduces speed to account for the conditions. Just like a human driver does.

Attachment causes misery in general. Also in relationships to humans.

FSD hard and software has just to be good enough for the job.

And still we cause so many deaths because we are tired, distracted or emotional when driving.

The assumption that ML lacks reasoning is outdated. While it doesn’t "think" like a human, it learns from more scenarios than any human ever could. A vision-based system can, in principle, surpass human performance, as it has in other domains (e.g., AlphaGo, GPT, computer vision in medical imaging).

The real question isn’t whether vision-based ML can replace humans—it’s when it will reach the level where it’s unequivocally safer.

Autopilot is not FSD and I bet many of the deaths were caused by inattentive drivers.

Which other system has a similar architecture and similar potential?

Which other system can drive autonomous in potentially any environment without relying on map data?

If merging data from different sensors increases complexity by factor 5, it's just not worth it.

Which are the unsolvable problems?

FSD is still in development

Front and back directly accessible for model 3 and y.

Used it. Can't tell if it was used, so warranty still intact.

Whataboutism is: "You said x but what about y?" Which doesn't make x any less valid or problematic.