No, it's good logic for dismissing objections to personal security and reasonable precautions. Which abusers are constantly complaining about not only women but minorities doing. Black panthers walk the streets with legal firearms, fascist jackboots descend upon them to turn it into a problem. Women want to carry mace in their purse or have single use unisex bathrooms with lockable doors, some asshole man complains about how little faith women have in him.

Don't be racist, don't be sexist, don't play shocked pikachu when oppressed demographics don't give the oppressing demographic the benefit of the doubt while they're still under oppressive conditions.

The reason why you can't live comfortably is because of the tremendous number of people who already committed fraud and/or are committing it right now. Don't blame the way the world is for your choice to perpetuate its failings. Ethics is for the brave. Don't be a coward, and certainly don't do it under the flag of science.

I mean, right away, doesn’t this necessarily have to be true? Doesn’t known physics simply break down in a singularity?

No, and yes but we're not talking about the singularity. The singularity may not even actually exist as far as actual observation is concerned. To the best of our understanding, physics inside an event horizon proceed exactly as normal, and all the perceived weirdness is due to us being outside observers watching something get rotated at a 90 degree angle to time.

That's piddly philosophical metaphysics, not actual meta-physics. Don't know how to be any clearer about this or what your actual point is.

That's a cop-out. Metaphysics is literally meta-physics, not talking about the meaning behind physics or what it means that something can or can't be known. I don't think you understand what philosophy is.

Make yourself secure and see who tries to talk you out of it.

By admitting that the experiment I had spent over a year working on was kind of bad and fidgety and that the vague pattern we found in the data might as well be a measurement artifact or random chance when my professor said it was publishable quality?

Yes, that's exactly what you should have done. You should have recorded your failure and reframed the entire thing as a report on said failure instead of committing academic fraud. Like, no shit that's what you should have done. What the fuck.

This assumes that the laws of physics differ between the inside and outside of a black hole in a way similar to genetic mutation, and there's no evidence that's even possible, let alone a likely scenario.

The character is underage, so I certainly hope not.

The effect looks more penetrable sex toy than anime imo.

No, it's a hypothesis, and if it can't be disproven then it's not science.

If I were to write this as hard science fiction

Then you would present it as such, and not as a "theory" having anything to do with reality.

Borders on creepo behavior for me, and since you're more interested in excuses than the concern I'm raising, I'm going to block you and peace out. Have a nice day.

Do you normally use your NSFW artstyle with underage characters?

It's the fact that non-consensually touching a stranger's child is absolutely unacceptable behavior. Why do you have such a hard time understanding that? Are you looking to get away with something like this in the future and want to make sure it's downplayed sufficiently? Get outta here with this pretense of not understanding the issue.

why they’re flattening the two things

That's not what's going on though. The two things share one very very crucial detail in common that y'all keep pretending isnt being mentioned repeatedly in this thread. Deal with that or do not expect to continue this conversation.

Why are you?

a pat on the head

a punch in the face

Their differences are irrelevant to the question of "was it done intentionally to a stranger without their consent?" If the answer is yes then it wasn't okay, whether it was a pat on the head, a punch in the face, or a grab by the pussy.