Mate... It's an anime girl. That could be 15, 18 or 45. Anime characters all look the same unless they go out of their way to specificly target a stereotype of an age group. And even then it basically boils down to boob size.

Unless your assuming flat chested women are children there's nothing here to indicate anything related to age beyond generic female.

It's definitely not kid coded so high school to college to adult could all be at play here.

Which then begs the question. Why the hell are you defaulting to assuming she's that young? Just move on if you dislike it. If your that worried notify the mods.

There are proper ways to handle this.

Ain't no kink in the world that's problematic as long as everyone is sane and consents.

If you were improving them for the sake of the male gaze or some how selling them for male pleasure. Then yes.

If you were talking about women's health, comfort or anatomy. Then no.

Always nice to see meru.

Even if you can only manage it once... JUST to say you did it. Would make an amazing oversharing fact. I know i got a chuckle from it. But my sense of humor is rather fucked.

An instance that should be ignored by any reasonable standard really.

Ranked competitive prodrugs

Hmm it might be a compliment. But it needs 3 more months of peer review i think

My truck is to just never read replies ever.

Then I can never argue with a bot!

If I don't naturally come across the post again then I just forget it ever happened. Like old forums!

Deferring all your work to anything or anyone would do the same thing.

That's not a llm unique problem but a byproduct of not engaging your mind or skills. You can still do that while also using an llm or taking on human help.

If you hired a human to do everything for you, you also end up becoming a potato.

The problem is that llms make it too easy for people to actively choose that route because of lack of self discipline or desire to improve.

But a lot of technology is like that and not just computer tech.

He's 20 years past his prime sadly.

I would legit get a chuckle if it all just boils down to storage and recall.

You just just a sufficient amount of non volatile storage with redundancy and a high enough data throughput to use it.

But to even attempt to test that properly I think we might need to do some unethical bullshit.

But we do that anyways!

Mate anyone worth their salt could speed text on a t9 blindfolder under their desk and the teacher or police would never notice!

Yeah my first thought looking at the title was literally... But I'm doing an extremely hard task while the dumb slop machine is doing an entirely different task.

I'm not just sitting there waiting around not thinking.

So how is that causing me to lose the ability to persist at hard things.

The article after reading it raises some good points but that head line is nonsense.

I mean you can see the same thing all the time with caudled kids. Kids who grow up with a bunch of help and servants and waited on if they aren't pushed they just end up helpless.

This isn't an LLM problem. It's just a known issue with dependency. It's been a problem as far back as history goes.

It's just before it was a problem that mostly the rich were allowed to have. And now it's cheap enough that everyone gets to have it!

It sounds like you enjoy coding more then managing.

Not enjoying something is going to lead to no attention span related to that thing after all.

Which is a pet theory why I think so many software guys and long time Linux users say this.

Fundamentally it's just not fun. It's not interesting. Even if the AI can produce perfectly fine and working code. It's not great cose, but it's also not buggy in a way that gives you challenges to solves problems to understand.

Ai is just mundane. It removes the enjoyment form computers in exchange for mediocrity and functionality. It works "well enough". And that is more of a sin then anything else when it comes to long term engagement.

Personally I can stare at a prompt for 8 hours straight and debug and improve the harness, the system, the thing it makes, manage it, fiddle with its memory set up, make entire new workflows or systems for it.

The actual product it makes tho? Boring and I tend to forget about them a week later.

The process is boring as fuck to most people AND what it makes is boring.

So either you need to find the process fun, or make something with it you actually personally use day to day.

I had the same problem with 3d printers. They are cool as fuck. But the stuff I made was... Meh cause it wasn't useful I just made it cause I could.

Now you need a human control. Provide a human assistant to do the same.

Is this a problem of AI or a problem of dependency.

Cause from my understanding of the topic this same phenomenon happens when people are given too much assistance of any kind form any source.

Not many people will actively drive themselves if given a solution with low barriers.

It's such a common thing it's been a trope among noble classes though out the ages. If you coddle someone they go full potato.

God damn, your in fantastic shape. Your hard work shows.

Climbing is a damn fun hobby. Wish I could still do it. Was the best shape of my life when I could.

Enjoy it while you can!

Not sure I agree on the feeling aspect but that's a philosophical disagreement in theory.

I can agree wholeheartedly on banning commerical llms because watching altman lose everything would tickle me pink.

Yeah at this point trying to ban ai code is like trying to ban sunlight in the desert.