I regret to inform you that Linux runs Genshin Impact just fine.
@programming.dev
I regret to inform you that Linux runs Genshin Impact just fine.
Am I missing something or do two cloud computing services, two database systems, and a search engine have nothing to do with a game engine? Cuz this looks like a false equivalency whataboutism two-for-one combo to me.
Please, for the love of who ever you hold in high esteem, use swap. See: https://chrisdown.name/... Now I don't really like the whole "Heres an article from some rando to prove my point" thing, but anecdotally, the article does line up with my experience (with 32 gigs of system memory). Namely, when I went without swap I experienced frequent system lock-ups, when I added swap on zram, lock ups still happened but less frequently, and when I eventually changed swap on zram to disk swap on the recommendation of this article lock ups never happened again.
From my digging on alternatives the main contenders are (in no particular order)
One thing that's wormed its way onto the to do list that haunts the back of my mind, is I'd like to see if I could abuse the matrix or XMPP protocols to get some of the nicer discord-like features lime invite links, server side channel ordering, and space membership over channel membership. But that's unlikely to happen any time soon.
EDIT: Forgot Fluxer. Added.
Bruno has telemetry users can't opt out of: https://github.com/usebruno/bruno/issues/337
Which, IMO, is unacceptable.
Well that explains the strange bug I started encountering in xfce recently. I guess I'll be spending tomorrow researching DEs, though I'll probably end up just using TDE or maybe CDE.
EDIT: clarified that the bug is in xfce, not xfwl.
The thing is the average person either can't or can't be bothered to remember even a dozen actually secure passwords, so they fall back to a couple of simple derivations of a common password, meaning each and every site a user signs up on represents an additional single point of failure.
They may not be de jure be public utilities but they are de facto public utilities. It is essentially impossible to live in society without them, and outside their collusionist cabal there are no real alternatives.
Unfortunately "AI," and LLMs in general are, at present, wholly inseparable from the people who use them, and especially, (and more pressingly), the people corporations that make them. This is the reason I maintain my opposition to "AI" (and LLMs in general) despite machine learning as a field and LLMs as technology being truly fascinating, and having immense potential.
In my ideal world the corporations pushing "AI" wouldn't exist, the datasets and recipes would be open, and model training would be a community led effort with Folding@Home style distributed compute used for training, pretty much removing the viability of "AI" companies. Without "AI" companies pushing for adoption, strong social pushback can be used to reign in the slopification of the commons. With those two together (and likely many other smaller changes elsewhere) LLMs can be seen for what they really are and their real pros and cons evaluated.
But that world isn't currently feasible, and probably won't ever be. Neither is toppling even a single corrupt corporation on the level of Alphabet, or Microsoft. So all we can do is evaluate whether we consider certain software's use of "AI"/LLMs is acceptable, and advocate for not using them. Which is why I think efforts like openslopware, and pages like this are a positive thing, even if I don't necessarily agree with some of the specifics.
Because they got bought out by venture capital. Even if they're not so bad currently, they're eventually going to want a return on their "investment," and that return is going to come at the expense of the users.
Agree it disagree with them, but don’t the payment processors get a say in what they do or do not want to process?
Absolutely not. Power companies don't get a say in what the power they supply their users with is used for, same for water companies and even ISPs. If they really, really want to enforce rules on what they will and will not process payments for, they can accept legal responsibility when they process a payment on a gun someone uses to shoot up a school or what have you. But they cant have it both ways.
Honestly, same. I initially dismissed Zig due to their insistence on making unused variables an error even in debug builds but if they keep this up I may have to just Get Over It.
I suppose that's true, but then the question becomes: how many people proselytizing Godot/OSS use these services personally vs in a corporate environment where they may not have a choice? Because I'm not sure the supposed hypocrisy the meme is "joking" about actually exists.
As much as I hate "AI" myself, rhetoric like this does more harm to movements resisting "AI" than to help them.
Minor clarification: your Arch Linux link is for archinstall, the easier install script, not Arch Linux itself. IIRC it's not even the officially recommended way to install Arch.
C++ is pretty alright, IMO, but the syntax is kinda clunky though, I think probably because of some historical baggage.
Your use of Luddite as a pejorative outs you as willfully ignorant of both the matter at hand and the history of the Luddite movement. Your alignment with the corporate narrative here makes you sound like far more of a republican than any "AI" critic I've ever seen. Especially that "foreign operative" call out, that's peak republican right there.
There was a bit of drama on tumblr (owned by Automattic) not too long ago where a relatively well known trans blogger got banned as a part of an alleged harassment campaign. I recall Matt Mullenwag (Automattic's CEO) being accused of following the user on to other platforms and harassing them. There were also accusations of, IIRC, tumblr staff taking payments to ban users. Which isn't great. So if my memory is accurate, your gut feeling is probably right.
Edit: typo, slleged -> alleged
Yeah, the same person who wrote the article I linked above also wrote one on zram vs zswap, which I think is also a good read: https://chrisdown.name/...
Definitely. As nice as it would be, I don't think it will significantly change any time soon, for several reasons. Not least of which is because several programs would likely just flatly refuse to implement such a change, judging by some of them refusing to even consider patches to implement the XDG Base Directory Specification.
thanks for using Leebra!
go to feed...