That's history repeating once again. The rich abuse the poor, pick a fight, conscript the poor and are then shocked when the abused farmers would just stand aside when the attack came. Smart nobility knew this is a two way even street.
@europe.pub
That's history repeating once again. The rich abuse the poor, pick a fight, conscript the poor and are then shocked when the abused farmers would just stand aside when the attack came. Smart nobility knew this is a two way even street.
EU is doing that by putting "you are liable for your AI" in law code. Big Tech was not amused.
You also have the circular investment. NVIDIA puts money into OpenAI. It uses that money to buy computing power from Oracle, who then fills its datacenters with hardware from NVIDIA. Everybody's valuation rises.
Edit: valuation, not validation
Only until AI investor money dries up and vibe coding gets very expensive quickly. Kinda how Uber isn't way cheaper than a taxi now.

Not a cartoon anymore.
USA support
Yep. Make it the manufacturers' problem. They only care when it hits their wallet. Even if they pass on the costs, it'll make the wipes that actually dissolve properly cheaper and these are exempt.
Zero tolerance rules they usually have means you can go all the way and still get punished just as bad as a light punch, so no reasen to hold back anything.
Superheros also just preach that you have to maintain the status quo, never tackle the root of the problem, just violently attack the symptoms and that only a small few special people can save you, so everybody else just has to get out of the way and cheer.
Kids learning to avoid government control and setting up covert communication seems like a very important lesson later in life these days.
AI works, we lose our jobs.
AI doesn't work, bubble pops, we lose our jobs.
AI sorta kinda works, wages get depressed and things turn into a dystopian hellhole.
Not that much reason to be positive and he doesn't know how to fix it.
Huang doesn’t have a solution for the very real risk of job displacement
One study I found is where they let people (their control group) check some data about effectiveness of a certain shampoo. They all found the correct answer. Then they let people do the exercise with the exact same data but said it was about gun control. Suddenly a part of the participants failed at basic math and had a lot of rationalizations.
Some folks will not just accept any fact or data that goes against a belief held by their peer group. Giving facts will even be seen as a personal attack.
That was a discussion point some time ago. People complained batteries from ev were not being recycled. Meanwhile the numbers showed there were not enough batteries to recycle because everybody was using them for grid storage and they last a long time. Only batteries from cars that crashed too hard are not reused.
string boolEnable = "True";
And they'll probably shut down the AI servers in a few years for cost reduction making the whole thing a huge waste of money.
Remove pedestrians, biking and transit because they take up car space. Now everyone drives and you're 45 minutes stuck in traffic.

Without scams, spam, slop, bots and ads, facebook would be rather empty.
It was not unexpected. Most big powers in history end like that. The rich always want more and eventually start taking it from everybody else, even if it's detrimental to the future of the nation.
"We don't drink blood here. That's something Christians do." ~Satanist member
thanks for using Leebra!
go to feed...