I'm Wren (they/them). I'm a programmer and cybersecurity student. I have a blog I don't update enough.
@lemmy.dbzer0.com
I'm Wren (they/them). I'm a programmer and cybersecurity student. I have a blog I don't update enough.
Ok? I feel like people don't understand how these things work. It's an LLM, not a superintelligent AI. It's not programmed to produce the truth or think about the answer. It's programmed to paste a word, figure out what the most likely next word is, paste that word, and repeat. It's also programmed to follow human orders as long as those order abide by its rules. If you tell it the sky is pink, then the sky is pink.
Well of course he should be charged for burglary and theft. He did commit those crimes, but I don't think he should be charged with murder. He didn't shoot the gun, the cop did. I'm not necessarily saying the cop should be charged with murder though.
I already have a dark theme set, I'm using catppuccin's colors What I'm trying to have it do is when a button is pressed, it switches to the light version of it
currently my code looks something like this:
#theme-toggle:checked ~ body {
background-color: #eff1f5;
color: #fff;
}
#theme-toggle:checked ~ html {
background-color: #eff1f5;
}
#theme-toggle:checked ~ .content {
background-color: #eff1f5;
}
the button itself is a checkbox that has display set to none and the label set as an svg so when you click the icon, it gets checked.
<input style="display: none;" type="checkbox" id="theme-toggle">
<label for="theme-toggle" class="theme-button">
<img class="theme-button-svg" src="./icons/half-moon.svg">
</label>
I used a similar strategy when making the menu for the site so I know it should work
what it protects against is group ideology. I don't want to start thinking things simply because the political party I align most with thinks that, and unfortunately, identifying with a political group can make people start doing that.
what it protects against is group ideology. I don’t want to start thinking things simply because the political party I align most with thinks that, and unfortunately, identifying with a political group can make people start doing that. I do recognize my biases when making decisions, it's important to do so, I just find it becomes harder to do that when I start identifying with a group
ok, I have a new problem, it doesn't work when I try to use the class for example
.content:has(#theme-toggle:checked) {
color: #4c4f69;
}
won't work :[
Yeah, its running a website. All ports are on default deny except 22, 80, 443, and 9050. 9050 is for the onion version of the site, and 80 auto-redirects to the https version of the site. 22 is rate limited to help protect against brute-force attacks. The requests are coming from multiple IPs, some of them are 117.72.47.192, 172.71.184.89, and 162.158.87.100. the one that sent that specific packet is 82.147.85.33 and no user agent is provided. Most of the malicious packets have user agents attached, but that specific one doesn't I also am seeing another weird one sent by 138.197.16.14
"238\x00ll|'|'|SGFjS2VkX0Q3NUU2QUFB|'|'|WIN-QZN7FJ7D1O|'|'|Administrator|'|'|19-11-28|'|'||'|'|Win 10 Pro x64|'|'|No|'|'|S17|'|'|..|'|'|SW5ib3ggLSBPdXRsb29rIERhdGEgRmlsZSAtIE1pY3Jvc29mdCBPdXRsb29rAA==|'|'|" 400 166 "-" "-"
For my server, secure enough. Just the basic recommendations, non-standard ssh port, default deny on firewall, fail2ban, etc. It doesn't need a lot of security because its just a static website. For most projects this is enough.
I will say, a honeypot can be useful and I'm getting one set up but its a low priority for me.
thanks for using Leebra!
go to feed...