I might just be in denial, but I've always felt like Tarantino's problematicity was overblown
@lemmy.blahaj.zone
Frankly, I think this is giving them too much credit. They don't have goals, and their grievances are manufactured so as to be too vague to be addressed (where there are real grievances, solutions or even band-aids are unacceptable for... (((reasons))))
They're literally just trolls who like to be angry and will find reasons to be angry. I'd say breaking the government in the process is seen as a side bonus for them, but I don't think they're even aware it's happening.
These people are fucking morons.
Even if you buy that premise, the output of the robot is only superficially similar to the work it was trained on, so no copyright infringement there, and the training process itself is done by humans, and it takes some tortured logic to deny the technology's transformative nature
Maybe. But if I was thinking about buying into their ipo I might be pretty skeptical of a social media site that's actively antagonizing their users while it can barely turn a profit when 90% of their labor force are unpaid volunteers.
Engagement can be fleeting and I'm not sure their archive content is as valuable to LLMs as they think it is.
I could never really afford it anyway. Cars are expensive, rockets are very expensive, and microblogging is a fundamentally bizarre concept to me.
I guess I could not use his fake trains?
In a way, it's impressive this guy shitposted his way to the king of exploiters, but there's nothing to boycott
thanks for using Leebra!
go to feed...